OrbitalDawn
Ulysses Everett McGill
Wow, that's quite the strawman mate, please quote the part where I said that the statue offended me? I just think there must be better people from that period to honor... In my mind statues are supposed to represent heroic figures, not perfect people because no one is perfect and people have flaws
So Ghandi....all good
Churchill... a great leader
Paul Kruger.. did a lot of good things
Buddha.. no complaints
etc, etc...
But why would we want statues of genocidal madmen in public spaces (Stalin , Mao), what do you think that a statue of said person adds and what does society lose if that statue is removed?
You have used the phrase "destroying history" a few times which i still think is cheap quote that has no real meaning but for all that, did you even know the first thing about Edward Colston before today? Far from destroying history the act probably gave him more exposure than he's had in a hundred years...
As I said, some people are always going to be divisive and you can make arguments either way(especially in SA with our history) but can we at least agree that we don't need statues of mass murderers or slave traders...?
I don't agree with the vandalism either, but this logic followed to its conclusion would actually require them to be advocating erecting more statues, including ones of Stalin and Hitler, and Mao.
How else would anyone know history, going by their 'statues = history' reasoning?
Ah there is the dishonesty once again. Try saying... illegal immigrants. That way you won't look like a complete and utterly brainwashed MSM follower.
> Parrots Fox News
> Claims others are "utterly brainwashed MSM followers"