ForceFate
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 51,021
- Reaction score
- 37,713
Yes. Then how did you construe that to mean he wasn't black enough?Hey you're the one who said he had a black parent "BUT in reality he grew up on the other side".
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yes. Then how did you construe that to mean he wasn't black enough?Hey you're the one who said he had a black parent "BUT in reality he grew up on the other side".
I don’t even know why I’m entertaining this but sure, I’ll give you one, only because I had screenshot it. Good thing I did, because it’s now deleted. As most racist posts are which is what makes it difficult to find them.
View attachment 855799
But of course we’ll hear why it’s not racist.
And that’s a mild one. I’ll just tag you in future.
Could you point out the racism here?
If you can’t see the posts, there’s no point in pointing them out really. We all know it would be a futile exercise.
Aaaand we’re back here again.
It's no different from the kind of language Julius uses. "white people this...white people that"Could you point out the racism here?
Could you point out the racism here?



Check out all the interpretation here , a load of assumptions are being made here by the self proclaimed non-racist.Could you point out the racism here?
Who do you think is being referred to when saying “fckem cuntz”?
Hint: it’s not the rapist or his buddy.
Edit: not to mention “blacks broke in”
Not even “black people”.
“Blacks”. Could’ve been worse I guess, he could’ve said “The blacks”.
Check out all the interpretation here , a load of assumptions are being made here by the self proclaimed non-racist.
So many assumptions with no facts , the pro tip here is , there was no racism in that post.
Who do you think is being referred to when saying “fckem cuntz”?
Hint: it’s not the rapist or his buddy.
Edit: not to mention “blacks broke in”
Not even “black people”.
“Blacks”. Could’ve been worse I guess, he could’ve said “The blacks”.
It's no different from the kind of language Julius uses. "white people this...white people that"
/sigh
Its all hurt feelings and no facts .Yeah I don't know. Seems pretty tame in comparison to the language Julius uses.
Anyway I'm not venturing any further into this circle jerk of a thread. If that post offends you then you're pretty thin skinned.
I live across the road from a less privileged community, I'm more concerned about what happens there.
Peace.
Yeah I don't know. Seems pretty tame in comparison to the language Julius uses.
Anyway I'm not venturing any further into this circle jerk of a thread. If that post offends you then you're pretty thin skinned.
I live across the road from a less privileged community, I'm more concerned about what happens there.
Peace.
“fck all the people who look like the people that did this horrible thing”. That’s the problem. There are a lot of people with that attitude.
or our resident deflector @abzo could tell us why when he chose to call it racist then say others have to answer his strawman argument.It’s not about what was said. The dangerous part about it is that this person has an attitude of “fck all the people who look like the people that did this horrible thing”. That’s the problem. There are a lot of people with that attitude.
But maybe our resident expert @Jabulani22 can tell us what was meant by that post.
Could you point out the racism here?
Haha, crime going to skyrocket.
arstechnica.com
Racial superiority is not the same as slavery, try again.
EDIT: also no one "defended slavery" they defended their then legal right to import more.... a completely different thing.
A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery.
Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery—the greatest material interest of the world. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union...
As a separate republic, Louisiana remembers too well the whisperings of European diplomacy for the abolition of slavery in the times of annexation not to be apprehensive of bolder demonstrations from the same quarter and the North in this country. The people of the slave holding States are bound together by the same necessity and determination to preserve African slavery.
Of course, how else is the average rioter meant to watch the history channel if they don't have the latest 4K Sony Bavaria...
Statues are a part of human history. The values are whatever the public wish to place on them. If people didn't recognize them as part of history they would make them out of paper mache and burn them.
No it isn't actually.
History is there for people to read and draw their own conclusions from. This is what civilization demands of people.
Except of course, the presidency, the senate, and the power to actually make and enforce laws. Right wing political bodies are still in ACTUAL power in the US and the UK the last I checked.
Revisionism has entered the chat.