The problem with Google Allo goes well beyond its awful privacy configuration
After its launch on September 21, Allo hasn’t stopped generating controversy. Although the functionality of the application is good, its terrible privacy configuration has made many turn away from it. Although that is important, it’s not the only problem with Allo, since it seems that Google doesn’t understand the importance of a real global launch.
If you value your privacy, then Allo isn’t for you. It’s a fact is the new messaging application from Google not only requires access to almost every part of your telephone, it’s also one of the least discreet and with the worst privacy configuration that there is right now.
In short, Allo doesn’t encrypt your end-to-end communications by default (like the vast majority of apps of this type). This type of encryption can be activated in incognito mode, but doing so would sacrifice the most characteristic option of the application: Google Assistant. Furthermore, during the I/O presentation, Google announced that it wouldn’t store the conversations, but this hasn’t ended up being true. As it turns out, Google will store all the information that you send in the app in order to improve the service.
As a consequence, Allo has created a public debate in which many have expressed their opinion in recommending users not install the application if they want to keep their privacy intact. Among them, Edward Snowden, a key figure in the movement to create awareness in digital privacy, has strongly recommended that the user community should not install Allo.