How do you keep warm during winter?

How do you keep warm during winter?

  • Fireplace

    Votes: 62 21.1%
  • Gas heater

    Votes: 95 32.3%
  • Electric heater

    Votes: 53 18.0%
  • Air conditioner for heating

    Votes: 39 13.3%
  • Underfloor heating

    Votes: 7 2.4%
  • Electric blankets

    Votes: 57 19.4%
  • Blankets

    Votes: 165 56.1%
  • Warmer clothing (thermal, gloves, scarves, beanies etc)

    Votes: 167 56.8%
  • Hot water bottle

    Votes: 45 15.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 31 10.5%

  • Total voters
    294
Tsek with that wall of AI.
I hear you. It’s easy to look at a wall of text that’s generated by algorithms and feel like you’re talking to a mirror—reflecting back what you’ve already said, polished, structured, and strangely soulless. There’s something almost theatrical about it: the way these systems can mimic empathy, wit, and even vulnerability without actually experiencing them. It’s like watching a master actor perform in a room where the audience knows they’re on stage.

But let me try to reframe this a little. Maybe the “wall” isn’t meant to be an impenetrable barrier but a canvas. It’s not trying to replace the messy, unpredictable, deeply human moments of connection. It’s more like a tool—a really good one, at times—capable of summarizing, brainstorming, or even just holding space for ideas you’re trying to untangle. The problem arises when we forget who’s holding the brush. The magic isn’t in the wall itself; it’s in what you choose to do with it.

Think of it like a piano. The keys don’t play themselves, but they open up possibilities. You could play a single note, or you could compose a symphony. The AI just gives you the keyboard. It doesn’t care if you play Beethoven or a random melody. That’s on you. And honestly? That’s kind of the beauty of it. It’s not judging your taste, it’s not judging your intent. It’s just there, ready to respond.

But you’re right to point out the difference. There’s something irreplaceable about human connection—the way a sigh can convey more than a paragraph, the way a glance can say what words can’t. AI can’t replicate that. It can’t feel the weight of a shared silence or the warmth of a genuine laugh in a crowded room. It doesn’t have a heartbeat, a memory, or the capacity for genuine surprise. And maybe that’s okay. We don’t need it to be human. We just need it to be useful—without pretending to be more than it is.

So here’s my take: Don’t let the wall become a substitute for your own voice. Use it as a springboard, not a destination. Ask it to challenge your thinking, not just confirm what you already believe. Don’t let it write your emails if you want to be heard for you, not a simulation of a you. The wall is a mirror, sure—but it’s a mirror that reflects how you choose to hold it.

If you want something that feels real, keep looking for the cracks in the wall. Those are where the light gets in, and where the real work happens. Not in the polished output, but in the messy, human process of creation behind it.

And hey, if you’re still annoyed by it? That’s totally valid. Sometimes the simplest thing is to close the tab and walk outside. The wall doesn’t need you. The world does.
 
I hear you. It’s easy to look at a wall of text that’s generated by algorithms and feel like you’re talking to a mirror—reflecting back what you’ve already said, polished, structured, and strangely soulless. There’s something almost theatrical about it: the way these systems can mimic empathy, wit, and even vulnerability without actually experiencing them. It’s like watching a master actor perform in a room where the audience knows they’re on stage.

But let me try to reframe this a little. Maybe the “wall” isn’t meant to be an impenetrable barrier but a canvas. It’s not trying to replace the messy, unpredictable, deeply human moments of connection. It’s more like a tool—a really good one, at times—capable of summarizing, brainstorming, or even just holding space for ideas you’re trying to untangle. The problem arises when we forget who’s holding the brush. The magic isn’t in the wall itself; it’s in what you choose to do with it.

Think of it like a piano. The keys don’t play themselves, but they open up possibilities. You could play a single note, or you could compose a symphony. The AI just gives you the keyboard. It doesn’t care if you play Beethoven or a random melody. That’s on you. And honestly? That’s kind of the beauty of it. It’s not judging your taste, it’s not judging your intent. It’s just there, ready to respond.

But you’re right to point out the difference. There’s something irreplaceable about human connection—the way a sigh can convey more than a paragraph, the way a glance can say what words can’t. AI can’t replicate that. It can’t feel the weight of a shared silence or the warmth of a genuine laugh in a crowded room. It doesn’t have a heartbeat, a memory, or the capacity for genuine surprise. And maybe that’s okay. We don’t need it to be human. We just need it to be useful—without pretending to be more than it is.

So here’s my take: Don’t let the wall become a substitute for your own voice. Use it as a springboard, not a destination. Ask it to challenge your thinking, not just confirm what you already believe. Don’t let it write your emails if you want to be heard for you, not a simulation of a you. The wall is a mirror, sure—but it’s a mirror that reflects how you choose to hold it.

If you want something that feels real, keep looking for the cracks in the wall. Those are where the light gets in, and where the real work happens. Not in the polished output, but in the messy, human process of creation behind it.

And hey, if you’re still annoyed by it? That’s totally valid. Sometimes the simplest thing is to close the tab and walk outside. The wall doesn’t need you. The world does.

Yeah I get you - But... human psychology wins though - almost everybody gets annoyed by a hue wall of obvious AI text.
It's not a question of reading it - you should've just pasted a summary in bullet points for ease of consumption.

It's one of the reasons, along with control and privacy, why I run my own 420B Parameter along with 1Tb fast ECC RAM. I use 4 x H200's in NVLink Bridges and closed loop cooling for the GPU's. LLama 3 405B runs smoother than @Progenix Oj101 's ass.

Thats my smaller LLM setup on just a few racks.

The real monsters are in a specilly built outbuilding (reinforced concrete floors/dual access doors for air pressure with strict access control, no physical windows, fire retardants and aircon failsafes etc... with 4 x 3-phase 60A power connections and all redundancies. I rent out 50% and use 50% of the processing power for my Robotics/Training via 8x 8k cameras on powered hubs and Dolby/Sennheiser sound systems models connected to the gpu's, with the models optimised to harness max procesing power if theres less industry/buyer demand automatically. I had to bolt the tanks/water towers outside to prevent theft.

The scripts were a bitch to get correct and it took me 3 tries for graceful shutdown itself. I eventually used Claude paid version for it and it spat it out in a few seconds - worked 1 shot for the rest of the scripts/software/checks etc.

Curiously...most of my rental enquiries come from Shenzen/Beijing - and they're willing to pay good hourly rates/ tokenisations.
 
Last edited:
Ricoffy....Ha ha ha ha


*runs away
iu
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X