HP ProLiant MicroServer

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,505
Somewhat unrelated (though its still an HP machine)..

Thanks to this thread, I'm going to be rebuilding one of my HP ML110's this weekend using UNRAID just to give it a go and see how it performs on my network.
 

The_Unnamed

WUD FTW
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
13,437
An option you could explore is XBMC Live on Ubuntu using SABnzbd+ for your nzb/torrents or utorrent, both of which provide web interfaces to manipulate them.

With respect to the RAID 5, the HP MS doesn't support it natively, so maybe investigate unRAID or something similar; jannievanzyl is best suited to offer you suggestions in this regard.

I was thinking about running XBMC live. Wasn't sure if i could still set up a software RAID 5 with it.
 

The Philosopher

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
1,583
Is the microserver still available. Looks like what i need. I just need NAS, with no frills or fuss. i dont need raid.
 

shadow_man

Executive Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
6,200
Quick question for you guys here.

I want to get the HP server. Stick in a low profile GT210 and connect it to my tv. (Obviously)

What i ideally want is XBMC. Raid 5. And the ability to get to a web interface for torrent downloads.
What would the best route be for this?

I'm doing this via Debian Linux. I have 4 drives in a ZFS POOL in Raid-z1 (raid5 without the write hole). I then have XBMC installed and I have yet to decide what torrent client to use.

J
 

Lino

I am back
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
13,790
I'm doing this via Debian Linux. I have 4 drives in a ZFS POOL in Raid-z1 (raid5 without the write hole). I then have XBMC installed and I have yet to decide what torrent client to use.

J

Brag-gat:D
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,505
Right... after buggering around with UnRAID... colour me very impressed.

I'm just running the "free" version for now, but will give it an upgrade soon so that I can add more drives to the array...
 

The_Unnamed

WUD FTW
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
13,437
I'm doing this via Debian Linux. I have 4 drives in a ZFS POOL in Raid-z1 (raid5 without the write hole). I then have XBMC installed and I have yet to decide what torrent client to use.

J

So having limited knowledge of linux i will give this a go on the weekend :)
 

morkhans

A MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
10,896
I'm doing this via Debian Linux. I have 4 drives in a ZFS POOL in Raid-z1 (raid5 without the write hole). I then have XBMC installed and I have yet to decide what torrent client to use.

J

Transmission or deluge are good options.
 

jannievanzyl

Telecoms expert
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,270
This card will be sufficient for 1080p playback right?
Personally, I'd go for the highest spec card that fits in the 25w PCI-E power limitations of the HP MS.

AFAIK, this would then be the GT520, if you're looking at Nvidia. Currently only the Openelec distribution supports it OOB, but I've built two XBMC players with it on the HP MS and both are running rock solid.

At some point XBMCLive will also support it, but I'm becoming an Openelec convert. Boot time is seconds and you get much more of an 'appliance' feel with it.
 

The_Unnamed

WUD FTW
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
13,437
Personally, I'd go for the highest spec card that fits in the 25w PCI-E power limitations of the HP MS.

AFAIK, this would then be the GT520, if you're looking at Nvidia. Currently only the Openelec distribution supports it OOB, but I've built two XBMC players with it on the HP MS and both are running rock solid.

At some point XBMCLive will also support it, but I'm becoming an Openelec convert. Boot time is seconds and you get much more of an 'appliance' feel with it.

So do i set up my RAID using something like FreeNas first then install Openlec?
 

jannievanzyl

Telecoms expert
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,270
I am actually just thinking of running ubuntu and having XBMC load at start up .

You basically have 2 choices:

1. Stick everything onto one box - Ubuntu + RAID + XBMC + SABnzbd, etc. + + +

Pros:

One piece of hardware.
Most cost effective.

Cons:

Be prepared to spend your waking hours keeping it all in sync.
Upgrading one bit without the others becomes a challenge. (I guess for some this is a pro and not a con)
Single point of failure.

2. Separate functionalities into different systems - NAS on one box, media player on another, applications on a 3rd, etc.

Pros:

Devices become 'appliances'.
You tend to install and forget.
Fiddling with one does not affect the others.
Better performance, reliability, etc.

Cons:

You need multiple hardware platforms.
More expensive.

After many years of running with different variations of the above, I've come up with the following architecture.

1. Dedicated NAS - unRAID
2. Dedicated Media players - XBMC (openelec / XBMCLive)
3. Virtualisation, i.e. App Server (ESXi) - on here I have a few Windows and Unix machines. This replaced around 5 to 10 of my original systems running dedicated applications. Each VM performs one specific function, so effectively they're dedicated as well.

The above architecture allows me to rapidly back up, move or restore a specific system. I'm done spending hours getting systems working.
 
Last edited:
Top