I had forgotten why I hate non-apt distros

chiskop

Executive Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Messages
9,214
Reaction score
380
Location
Kensington, JHB
YaST is a POS.

Short story long: decided to upgrade to ubuntu 9.04 (from mint 6). But, halfway through the installation, it turns out the disc was damaged (got it from LXF magazine). So, now I don't have an OS on my hdd. :mad: No problem, I look for the next most recent OS I've got here, which is Suse 11.1.

So, I've installed Suse after a couple of years using ubuntu/mint:
1. I am not a KDE fan (I thought Suse used gnome, like all right thinking distros?)
2. I am most definitely not a YaST fan.

So, as soon as I can get a copy of ubuntu 9.04 or mint, I will be switching back to that.
 
If you don't mind installing from an Alternate CD, PM your address to me ;-)
 
YaST is a POS.
So, I've installed Suse after a couple of years using ubuntu/mint:
1. I am not a KDE fan (I thought Suse used gnome, like all right thinking distros?)
2. I am most definitely not a YaST fan.

So, as soon as I can get a copy of ubuntu 9.04 or mint, I will be switching back to that.

My story's the exact opposite. I was using OpenSuse, switched to Ubuntu 8.1 then upgraded to Ubuntu 9.04 for a couple of months before settling once again on OpenSuse. Apt-get install is very nice, but zypper works almost as well and YaST is a killer configuration tool (most of the time).
 
If you don't mind installing from an Alternate CD, PM your address to me ;-)

Cool - will bear that in mind flarkit.

I was playing with plasmoids a little bit, and kde is starting to grow on me again, but I'm just much more comfortable in a debian-based distro.
 
apt(itude) based distros generally handle dependencies much better. Having used Debian and Fedora (from 4 till 11), I have some experience of this. Though in Fedora, yum was much better since F10.
 
All distros should switch to Pacman, best package manager under the sun.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X