Internet Explorer versus Firefox

If the figures for IE are counted against every sale of a windows product then that is not representative of browser use, eg. installing windows 7, starting up IE to download firefox
 
to be expected with the success of windows 7.
it'll take at least 6 months for moms and pops to encumber their shiny new IE8 with yahoo toolbar, smilies toolbar, google toolbar, myway search bar...
that's a lot of dodgy shareware that needs to be carefully selected and installed first.
then when IE falls over, they'll download chrome or ff.
or phone me and ask me why their site isn't working.
 
I love the new Firefox 4 :)
I used to like FF, but it became to sluggish off late. I downloaded FF4 in Chrome and after 1 minute I was done. It's taking FF3 10 minutes to download FF4.
 
Frankly, I cannot fathom why anyone would not want to use Firefox.

Because Opera and Chrome are both faster (at least they were last time I checked, I don't use Firefox).

With regards to rendering, Firefox used to be pretty far behind with regards to standards compliance (although never as bad as IE). At the moment I think most browsers are pretty equal in this regard (except IE).
 
Internet Explorer 9 will look like Internet Explorer 8 which looked like Internet Explorer 7... and they all crash just as much (if not more) than IE6.

Firefox is the Browser which made the Internet really work for most people.
 
Because Opera and Chrome are both faster (at least they were last time I checked, I don't use Firefox).

With regards to rendering, Firefox used to be pretty far behind with regards to standards compliance (although never as bad as IE). At the moment I think most browsers are pretty equal in this regard (except IE).

true, minefield on acid 3 wasn't particularly impressive when i tried it a while back.
let's not even talk a html5 with the -moz-xxx / -webkit-xxx stuff.
 
unless you shout 'mac' when you buy a pc,you are an IE user by default,otherwise run to the regulators to force microsoft to bundle a competitor software in their products...
 
unless you shout 'mac' when you buy a pc,you are an IE user by default,otherwise run to the regulators to force microsoft to bundle a competitor software in their products...

or run to the regulators to not bundle an os with hardware at all...
 
I think they are pretty much the same. I downloaded FF a few weeks ago out of curiousity, but didnt see what the big deal was.....couldnt see anything spectacular. So I went back to Safari, because I am more familiar with it
 
I used to like FF, but it became to sluggish off late. I downloaded FF4 in Chrome and after 1 minute I was done. It's taking FF3 10 minutes to download FF4.

Just for the hell of it, (was bored) I downloaded FF4 in Chrome... It took +-6 minutes. Downloaded it again in FF... Took +-6 minutes... Download speed is not relative to the browser. You may have just hit a bit of network congestion at the time when you decided to download from FF.. It happens to the best of browsers! Just saying... (oops ... look there! Safari took 5 minutes! Yay for Safari)
 
If the figures for IE are counted against every sale of a windows product then that is not representative of browser use, eg. installing windows 7, starting up IE to download firefox

Either way, Microsoft win.
 
These figures confirm that the internet is 0.42% dumber than last month.
 
Frankly, I cannot fathom why anyone would not want to use Firefox.

+1

Stats are skewed and article seems to try to suggest that Firefox is losing ground to IE. Also, more non-IE users are likely to switch between Chrome, Firefox, Opera than TO IE. Stats could also indicate simply more online PC users who, by default, use IE and don't know any better.

Statistics are rarely evidence of anything more than numbers and statistical interpretation is always dependent on the reader :D

I, for one, am devout to Firefox :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X