[Internet] Usage Based Billing UBB - Canada is MAD

As per Netflix CEO, the true cost of providing bandwidth is roughly $.01 per gig.

WTF
 
Why am I feeling like ****? It's because I'm about to lose an extra $200 a year just because some large corporate giant says so: Recently, Bell Canada has had the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) make a decision that aims to take more money out of the pockets of Canadian consumers and ruin online services that are competitors to Bell Canada. This decision is called Usage Based Billing (UBB). Details for UBB can be found here: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-44.htm . To summarize it, the CRTC recently rendered a decision forcing all independent DSL and Cable Internet providers to substantially match incumbent (like Bell) usage rate caps. The data caps that Bell imposes are ridiculously small and would normally be avoided by switching services to another independent DSL Internet Service Provider (ISP). This will influence all internet service packages eventually, but DSL residential customers in Ontario and Quebec first, as of March 1. From March 1 on, users who purchase Internet packages in Ontario can expect a usage cap of 25GB (60GB in Quebec), substantially down from the 200GB or unlimited deals that these independent ISPs were able to offer before the CRTC’s decision to impose usage based billing.

Content and data like Netflix, YouTube, IPTV, large file downloads or other streaming services can consume large amounts of bandwidth and place cap limits in jeopardy very quickly. Users now need to monitor your usage carefully, as the CRTC has imposed a very high overage rate, above your new monthly limit, of $1.90 per gigabyte ($2.35 per gigabyte in Québec). Companies like Netflix, iTunes and other companies who provide digital content distribution services are harmed by this new decision and ISPs are using UBB as an excuse to limit our access to their TV competitors by making them cost prohibitive to access. It is a conflict of interests to allow our TV Broadcasters to also be our ISPs, and therefore, the gateway to their competition.

So far 107,578 people have signed a petition against this Usage Based Billing at http://openmedia.ca/meter .

This will start costing the average Canadian consumer exorbitant amounts of money as they start receiving massive Internet bills starting March the 1st. More information about UBB can be found here: http://www.antiubb.com/why-should-we-oppose-ubb/ . In conclusion, I (as an average consumer) am being forced to pay more money per month out of my pocket for less services than I used to receive only because Bell wants to be anti-competitive.

Edit: This link http://www.antiubb.com/what-can-i-do/ seems to provide some useful advice of what the average person can do against UBB. This matter may also be in violation of the Competition Act http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/h_00148.html#competition

Technology is supposed to progress, not regress.

I remember the States and some European countries imposing caps in internet access fairly recently.
 
Shame South Africa is always a step behind the popular trends.Haha look like all the Intenet-Addicted Canadians are going to be really poor now.Also looks like the Days of Mweb Uncapped are numbered.
 
Shame South Africa is always a step behind the popular trends.Haha look like all the Intenet-Addicted Canadians are going to be really poor now.Also looks like the Days of Mweb Uncapped are numbered.

Actually if you read the article and understood it, you would see the reasons behind imposing caps has absolutely nothing to do with load or usage but more the fact that they are able to legally obtain video content that would normally be provided by a tv provider online. The TV provider who is doubling as an ISP has forced regulations that independant isps must charge the same as certain other isp's which actuallly elliminates free market.
 
It's totally disgusting, the internet was supposed to be the ultimate expression of free speech, now it's turning into a media circus with big companies buying control of the internet from governments. This has to be opposed and put a stop to.
 
I guess the advantage of all this is, if the USA follows with "small" caps like that, it will mean all these services that requires gigs and gigs of downloads, especially updates and installs that is not compressed will need to make a plan to do so. I have felt, especially in the digital software space, that companies are "wasteful" in how they release their software/content and how they update it. They clearly design it with the assumption people have unlimited bandwidth, but i bet if the USA suddenly had these restrictions then these updates that gets pulled down every day or clients that needs a -complete- re-download for every little patch would no longer be viable.

Now i disagree if they are doing all this because of TV broadcasting feuds [kinda like the SABC going "we want you to pay a tv license and watch our crap on a tv as provided by us, so lets get govt. to impose a 1GB cap on internet so you can't watch the same content online" . That is just beyond stupid, but Canada [and Australia] seems to be well known to do rather stupid things . It's not surprise the USA always joke about their neighbors....
 
This has nothing to do with cost. It is the thin end of the wedge by governments to control the Internet.
 
Well, at least we have uncapped but I like the way the dude says "Because Canada has some of the slowest Internet speeds in the world" at 30mbps. Wonder how he would feel about SA,s 384kbps and 10mbps. Still, I bet that a hell of a lot of Canadians are pretty pissed off.
 
Wonder how he would feel about SA,s 384kbps and 10mbps.

You mean 4mbps, that's still the max any normal (except for a few handful exchanges) person will get in ZA.
 
You mean 4mbps, that's still the max any normal (except for a few handful exchanges) person will get in ZA.

True. I'm on a piss poor 384 line. And I'm guessing so is the majority of users in SA. even the 4mb lines are reserved for those who can afford it. I mean, it borders on extortion.
 
Going backwards... Looks like they invited someone from Telkom.
 
Information people, it's all about restricting how we access information. The "governments" of the world have long seen the world wide web as a threat to their control. I see allot more people wearing tinfoil hats in the future but by then it will be too late. :whistle:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X