cerebus
Honorary Master
Android was always going to be a consumer success story. That was obvious to me when the first G1 came out. It's got Google behind it, it's free and open source, it has a good quality app market, and it's pretty decent all in all. I'd say it's now become the scaffolding for mobile devices rather than the selling point in itself, but it's stable enough to run on just about anything and customizable enough to be branched into some very unorthodox forms. Quite a remarkable achievement all told and it's obvious that manufacturers would have seen it as a lifeline.That article just shows that Android is a consumer success story. If the author can get free apps on Android instead of paying Apple for the same apps then that is a good thing for him. I'm not going to complain about getting free things![]()
The problem has always been that it was a great, popular idea without a business model to gird it. Which has given Samsung the opportunity to muscle in and devour anything resembling profitability from its ecosystem. Nobody really even knows if Google makes money from it but I guess they must be somehow. All I know is, if the industry continues on current trends, we'll be left with Apple and Samsung phones on the shelves and that's it. So I'm not even slightly impressed by activation numbers when the profitability coming out of the back end is so terribly distorted.