iPhone 5 vs the world - smartphones compared

Some models do, some don't. It's a bit confusing. But I'm pretty sure the ones here do.

Only thing you can really go on though with the speed of these phones is going to be benchmarks. Apple claimed 2xcpu and gpu performance increase over 4S which would be astonishing if true. Probably would be more like a bit of this and a bit of that from the correct angle... But still it should be a very powerful processor. I don't think they skimped on high end parts in any way to make the phone.[/QUOTE

You mean the processor made by samsung? lol Apple is a trollish company indeed.
 
Seems Mybroadband is like Engadget, iphone gets released and endless articles posted that could have been one, where as an android device gets launched, one article only.

Agreed. Actually quite painful. But site bosses want post volumes to drive revenue and iPhone creates the necessary emotion to drive sales... Eh posts...

Not so: http://mybroadband.co.za/news/tag/samsung-galaxy-s3, http://mybroadband.co.za/news/tag/htc-one-x
 
Just came across it now and thought it was funny. Didn't see it posted on this thread? So not sure where else it's posted? Must admit, I'm not on here that much though.

Did you take offense? You must be an iPhone user... :sick::D

Was funny, very funny indeed and clarified many posts written on this forum. Rest my case:p
 
The A6 is a dual core underclocked at 1.2, memory will be 1Gig max. So SIII beats the iphone in every department.
 
Hitler finds out about the new iPhone...

[video=youtube;N5AHEd5kbT0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5AHEd5kbT0[/video]

Looks like a video from A'lo A'lo.

Classic.
 
The A6 is a dual core underclocked at 1.2, memory will be 1Gig max. So SIII beats the iphone in every department.
Remember that Android needs more processing power because it runs all your applications in a virtual machine, unlike iOS/MeeGo/WinMoPho which run natively compiled applications. Less CPU power equals longer battery life.
 
iOS is a less complex OS than Android so needs less horsepower. Android will need more and more horsepower as it ads complexity ... but that is what attracts me to it. "Project Butter" has however trimmed it down to do more with less.
 
Widgets, live wallpapers, endless customisation, etc that comes standard.
Ah OK, I wouldn't have considered these as being part of OS complexity, but then it depends on where you draw the line between OS and UI, and it has become blurry.
Does Android's UI also run inside the virtual machine?
These require more processor and battery horsepower.
Agreed, with a mobile device this is a compromise that has to be made.
 
The A6 is a dual core underclocked at 1.2, memory will be 1Gig max. So SIII beats the iphone in every department.
In lieu of facts, making up stuff also works fine.
 
In lieu of facts, making up stuff also works fine.

As we are dealing with different OS's a direct comparison between processors cannot be made. iOS requires less horsepower to do what Amdroid does. An iPhone with a lower spec processor will do the job well enough considering there are no widgets, live wallpapers and whatnot to keep live in Android's multitasking environment. Android is a bussy bee. iOS only works as/when needed.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X