South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Sh*t umpire decision, that was clearly a no ball.
Not really, he was not actually playing a shot. Rather defending a dangerous full toss.Should have stayed in his crease
Not really, he was not actually playing a shot. Rather defending a dangerous full toss.
Does not matter where he was. Even if half way down the pitch, don't bowl something that might harm the batsman deliberately.His moving forward out of his crease made it so ... , his choice
Does not matter where he was. Even if half way down the pitch, don't bowl something that might harm the batsman deliberately.
Like a bouncer?Does not matter where he was. Even if half way down the pitch, don't bowl something that might harm the batsman deliberately.
Yes, that's why the rule is there.Really ...
a bouncer hits the ground first.Like a bouncer?
Yes, that's why the rule is there.
Getting tired of arguing. A high full toss is dangerous and should be treated as such.So you deliberately change the arrival trajectory of the ball, after it has left the bowlers hand, think again. And yes really.
Getting tired of arguing. A high full toss is dangerous and should be treated as such.
Don't get me wrong... I do not really like Kohli , but I think he was right to be angry.
So let's move on.
They've never had good bowlers. Gayle and AB carried that team. Kohli with all his wonderful records doesn't have the x factor to take the game away in this format...RCB is doing what RCB does best. They simply do not have good bowlers.