Alanf85 said:
Really? Are you talking about the "bombing" in 1998?
Sorry, I confused Sudan with Somalia.
Ah and the amassing hostile armies on their border had nothing to do with it. What about the other wars. Did they start them as well?
Yeah, not possible that the moving of troops was the result of receiving intelligence that Israel was about to attack, right?
Well by your definition almost every developed nation on earth is a "rogue nation"
Not at all.
There was no "attack" to face had it not been for Hezbollah's actions
Hypocrisy again. Israel is allowed to go to war because some of its citizens were captured, but the reverse is not true, according to you.
Here you go with the whole "Christian" thing again.
Nope.
What has that got to do with Hezbollah, Israel and Iran.
Maybe you should inform yourself a bit better. There's a large group of Christians in Lebanon just like there are Sunnis and Shiites, and none of the three sects are particularly trustful of the others.
Well it's far more democratic than Hezbollah.
Let's see - Hezbollah is in the government.... so, the government is more democratic than itself? Bwahahaha!
From :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanon
wikipedia said:
As such, high-ranking offices in the government are reserved for members of specific religious groups. The President, for example, has to be a Maronite Catholic Christian, the Prime Minister a Sunni Muslim, the Deputy Prime Minister an Orthodox Christian, and the Speaker of the Parliament a Shi’a Muslim.
You still haven't answered why Irsael "invaded" in the first place?
Apparently because the PLO had established a base there.
Why weren't these bunkers and stockpiles built along the Syrian border then?
Ask Hezbollah.
The U.S have restrained themselves incredibly in Iraq. A more "human" war has never been fought before.
Define "human". And I guess you're ignoring things like Fallujah.
They could strat bomb whole cities into the ground if they wanted to.
And only an idiot would think that would be effective at the kind of resistance that the occupation forces are currently facing.
You claim they want oil but anybody can see it won't work so to cover that you write off the most powerfull people on earth as idiots.
Strawman.
Pity you can't reach the lofy heights that even an idiot can.
It's not a pity if it isn't true.
Islamic fundamentalist State with nukes +Islamic terrorists = Big problem.
Yeah, remind me why no one's b!tching about Pakistan? Also, since when is Syria an islamic state at all?
So why these "you tell me" and "I dunno" replies then.
Oh, so asking you to provide proof for your POV is now to be regarded as being ill informed.
Bullsh!t. The west just likes to think that so that it can delude itself and its population into justifying the violence it perpetrates in the middle east.
Not every muslim wants the destruction of Israel and to live under strict and distorted interpretations of Islam.
Indeed. And not every source of violence from a muslim in the middle east is caused by someone who wants to live under those strict and distorted interpretations of Islam. Admittedly many of them want to see the destruction of the state of Israel, but considering what a racist state it is, I can't really blame them.
And why, btw, is it tolerable for Israel to be a religious state that discriminates against everyone not of the chosen religion, but not for anyone else?
You can't seem to tell the difference between a ordinary Muslim and an extremist.
No, that's
your shortcoming.
You telling me Al Jazeera could not get the speech through their own sources but have to rely on "western' news agencies.
Not at all.
So why did you compare that scenario with the U.S suppling Israel with weapons. If you don't see any difference then surely Hezbollah has no right to "invade" America then?
I don't believe Hezbollah has the right to invade America. I don't believe America has the right to invade Lebanon to get at Hezbollah. You're the one who stated that America has the right to go to war with Hezbollah, and I responded by saying that by that standard Hezbollah has the same right. That does not imply that I support either side's right to go to war.
And the
actual point was that if supplying weapons is enough of a standard to go to war (with Iran), then each country in the middle east that has been in a war with Israel has the right to invade America because America supplied them with weapons.
I really think you should give spurious arguments like this a rest. I don't enjoy having to sift through pages of posts only to discover that my argument is being falsely rufuted with pure drivvel.