Ubisoft messed up with SC4, just like Ion Strom did with Invisible War. What does that have to do with the platform? How is a bad game an indication of the platform as a whole?
NFS Carbon is crap on PS2, does that mean PS2 is crap as a whole?
SC4 doesn't work on GF8? Yes I think it does. It's a crap game on any gfx card, but Ubisoft is not a representation of the platform.
The original thread title asks "Is pc falling behind?" It does not qualify this question at all. So we have to examine in which fields this would be, if it's new or if there's anything to debate at all.
As far as graphical prowess goes, the PC isn't falling behind, never has and won't in the foreseeable future. As far as number of titles go, consoles has always had more (NES days and onwards)
As a pick up and play item, the console has always been superior, because that's all it does. Gaming on the PC is only one of the things a PC can do so that argument is not highlighting anything new and for the most part is meaningless in this context.
So in all 4 pages, someone has yet to say exactly how the PC is falling behind and make a valid argument,![]()
It seems that in the future SC4 type games will become the norm. What I was trying to say is that if you manage to get your uber P.C to actually perform you still have to rely on the game coding being up to scratch.
Your right. Strictly performance wise P.C's are not falling behind.
Keep it up ShockG. I need all the help I can get if I'm to resist the dark side.
* about the 8800 here's the link http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2884&p=5*