Jacob Zuma found Not Guilty

Status
Not open for further replies.
Angelo said:
Aren't you glad there's myADSL where backward bigots like you can spew your bile but far away from the political mainstream?

Facts always make idiots like you grab for language and words to explain the pain the truth represents. Ditto. If it hurts highlight and read my full signature!

The point represented was that aids will reduce the populations by attacking guys like Zuma first. Pity about the many innocent sufferers but then again any war was never nice nor acceptable, why would nature's war against the bad folks be?

As for main stream you will be surprised how many politicians read this forum, maybe not all posts and threads but I can assure you they have PPl that read this lines to guage perceptions.

http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/bigot.htm
 
Last edited:
kingmonty said:
No no no no no. He is "not guilty" most certainly in no way implies he is "not innocent". He was innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, and therefore, by definition is innocent. Your logic is flawed. Jacob Zuma is innocent. Period. He has not committed any crime according to the Law, and in SA that's the only thing that matters. If you are accused of Murder, you will only be guilty of said murder when the court judges you as such.

The Words innocent and guilty have different meaning and not -guilty and innocent are not the same. my 2 cents

Innocent = Didnt commit the crime at all
Guilty = Comitted the Crime
Not-Guilty= May or May NOT have comitted the crime - but not enough evicence to substantiate a crime was comitted.
Thus ... innocent in the eyes of the law.

Its semantics ... The Sate versus Zuma . - Charge Rape .
The State was charging him with Rape ... hence, is He Guilty or not?! .. Innocence is not in the picture... the state had to submit proof that he was guilty.

He wasnt...
 
DigitalSoldier said:
Angelo and its a place where people can educate you and you dont know how to debate like in previous threads where people did educate you and you couldnt argue others opinion :D
some threads quickly deteriorate to rightwing extremists affirming and comforting each other, devoid of any reasonable or logical
political debate whatsover. In such instances trying to debate is futile and I have seen some great posters simply ignoring such threads, treating them with the disdain they deserve, so who am I to go in there. I'm willing to be "educated" in balanced threads.
 
Angelo said:
some threads quickly deteriorate to rightwing extremists affirming and comforting each other, devoid of any reasonable or logical
political debate whatsover. In such instances trying to debate is futile and I have seen some great posters simply ignoring such threads, treating them with the disdain they deserve, so who am I to go in there. I'm willing to be "educated" in balanced threads.

For every right winger there is an left-winger like you! Ditto! So anyone that says anything you do not agree with is right wingers. Only problem now is that the ANC runs the show, with the coincidental mess, the right wingers should be you or is that now left-wingers. Idiot!

By the way I hated the AWB if that is what you infer to as they were never any good for this country , same as You! By the way I think educating you is beyond anybody's capability! I made a simple factual statement with the Thread header in mind, Getting rid of Zuma with his aids view! You deteriorated this thread by just being here! Idiot!
 
Last edited:
Angelo - he is a corupt politician and a liar. That is all i need to know.
 
PS: Someone asked for a flame war on another thread, I also felt like one thats why i think I started one! here :D just to prove a point it so easy to trap race zealot fools like Angelo Hehe!:D
 
Angelo said:
some threads quickly deteriorate to rightwing extremists affirming and comforting each other, devoid of any reasonable or logical
political debate whatsover. In such instances trying to debate is futile and I have seen some great posters simply ignoring such threads, treating them with the disdain they deserve, so who am I to go in there. I'm willing to be "educated" in balanced threads.
Don't even get me started on you.
 
RichardP said:
The Words innocent and guilty have different meaning and not -guilty and innocent are not the same. my 2 cents

Innocent = Didnt commit the crime at all
Guilty = Comitted the Crime
Not-Guilty= May or May NOT have comitted the crime - but not enough evicence to substantiate a crime was comitted.
Thus ... innocent in the eyes of the law.

Its semantics ... The Sate versus Zuma . - Charge Rape .
The State was charging him with Rape ... hence, is He Guilty or not?! .. Innocence is not in the picture... the state had to submit proof that he was guilty.

He wasnt...
In the eyes of the law. Guilty or Not Guilty. Innocense is implied by either of those. In the eyes of the law. There are no other eyes, only speculation and assumption, i.e. Public and Private opinion. Public & Private opinion is your natural right, but it's not factual. Legal fact has been argued, and Legally speaking Zuma is innocent. You can think him a rapist, that's fine, it's your opinion. You may not, however, legally call him a rapist as he is not a rapist before the law.
 
pupa said:
PS: Someone asked for a flame war on another thread, I also felt like one thats why i think I started one! here :D just to prove a point it so easy to trap race zealot fools like Angelo Hehe!:D
[QUOTE=pupa]Only one consolation! In Africa what the colonialists could not do Aids will, ie reduce the population! I hope they do not find an cure for the next 20 Years, Africa population down by 65%?[/QUOTE]
 
P.S. I don't want Zuma to be president, and I hope he gets found guilty on the corruption charges. But that's my opinion. I couldn't care less about JZ, I think he is a d!ckhead, and a raving lunatic. Still my opinion. Please do not see my other posts as defending JZ, I'm not, I'm defending the courts and the law. I've also highlighted that I feel the Prosecution investigation system is likely highly flawed.
 
Angelo said:
[QUOTE=pupa]Only one consolation! In Africa what the colonialists could not do Aids will, ie reduce the population! I hope they do not find an cure for the next 20 Years, Africa population down by 65%?
[/QUOTE]
What?
 
Zuma is too high in power to be found guilty for anything, anyone ever watched Prison Break ? He's probably got dudes like that working for him.
 
Angelo said:
some threads quickly deteriorate to rightwing extremists affirming and comforting each other, devoid of any reasonable or logical
political debate whatsover. In such instances trying to debate is futile and I have seen some great posters simply ignoring such threads, treating them with the disdain they deserve, so who am I to go in there. I'm willing to be "educated" in balanced threads.



Thing is when some of us bring logic into something you will shoot it down as still having an apartheid mindset.

Bit of topic

For example the thread about the son who protected his father and killed 3 robbers the son i believe is a hero but some people still said he is a murderer and those defending him got an apartheid mindset
 
DigitalSoldier said:
Thing is when some of us bring logic into something you will shoot it down as still having an apartheid mindset.

Bit of topic

For example the thread about the son who protected his father and killed 3 robbers the son i believe is a hero but some people still said he is a murderer and those defending him got an apartheid mindset
Absolutely !! Excellent post !! Anytime we knock the anc (ok maybe i always do) then we are made out to be racists but actually we are anti - coruption and all the other crap they keep doing !!
 
craigsa said:
Absolutely !! Excellent post !! Anytime we knock the anc (ok maybe i always do) then we are made out to be racists but actually we are anti - coruption and all the other crap they keep doing !!
That just negated the statement you are making about being anti-corruption as you are simply anti-ANC/Transformation and pure hatred is all over your statements.
 
Most def

kingmonty said:
No no no no no. He is "not guilty" most certainly in no way implies he is "not innocent". He was innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, and therefore, by definition is innocent. Your logic is flawed. Jacob Zuma is innocent. Period. He has not committed any crime according to the Law, and in SA that's the only thing that matters. If you are accused of Murder, you will only be guilty of said murder when the court judges you as such.

:) Amen to dat
 
Angelo said:
That just negated the statement you are making about being anti-corruption as you are simply anti-ANC/Transformation and pure hatred is all over your statements.
No, He is a policeman and has first hand experience of how the ANC disregards its own citizens. In any event, your argument is irrelevant: CraigSA has th right to dislike a political organisation based on their principles or lack of delivery or quite simply for what they stand. Just like you have the right (and I'm 100% certain you exercise that right) of not agreeing to or even disliking the DA for example. Stop playing the race card already
 
Last edited:
kingmonty said:
No, He is a policeman and has first hand experience of how the ANC disregards its own citizens. In any event, your argument is irrelevant: CraigSA has th right to dislike a political organisation based on their principles or lack of delivery or quite simply for what they stand. Just like you have the right (and I'm 100% certain you exercise that right) of not agreeing to or even disliking the DA for example. Stop playing the race card already
Note once did I mention race in my statement but im glad YOU are the one who brought it up, I mean it's clear that Craig has declared his hatred for the ANC and it gonna be very difficult for me to view as objective his criticism of the ANC or the Government.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X