JJ Abrahams New Superman

Some random source..

Since Superman is a native of Krypton, a planet that had a red sun, under a yellow sun (like that of Earth's his Kryptonian cells act as living solar batteries, absorbing solar energy and giving him superhuman powers.

So seems he spent a lot of time in the sun, and got extremely dark ....
 
There was an entire black Kryptonian race on Krypton's Vathlo Island. Highly advanced like Wakanda

vepCOOH.jpg
 
Last edited:
Neva read the comics..... most of what I know comes from the movies and tv shows
 
Krypton wasn't an ice planetView attachment 1105220

Actually, that is revised Krypton. From the same source,


Krypton is a planet which orbits a red star. Before its destruction, it was home to a great civilization which boasted advanced science and technology. In many versions of the story, it was either barren or icy, and often the home to huge crystals and crystalline structures. Krypton had many strange creatures (such as glass-eaters) and beautiful landscapes that simply don't exist on other worlds. The planet was destroyed late in its life due to internal pressures (In most versions).

Krypton appears, or is at least mentioned, in almost every version of the Superman mythos. It has changed completely over the years while retaining many elements from its past.

It is the homeworld of Superman, but also to Supergirl, Krypto and other Kryptonians. Unfortunately, the destruction of the planet also created Kryptonite, radioactive chunks of the planet which are deadly to all Kryptonians. Jor-El told Louise McCallum, that Krypton has colors that humans couldn't even dream of.

Then in The Man of Steel section,

Following Crisis on Infinite Earths, which rebooted the history of the DC Universe and retroactively eliminated the existence of the Golden and Silver Age versions of Krypton, writer/artist John Byrne was given the task of recreating the entire Superman mythos. This rewrite was started in the 1986 Man of Steel miniseries, which addressed Krypton in both its opening and closing chapters.

...

The new Krypton was approximately the size of Earth and orbited a red sun called Rao 50 light-years from our solar system. Over 100,000 years ago, Krypton had already developed scientific advancements far beyond those of present-day Earth, and by a few millennia past had conquered disease, learned to retard the aging process, and perfected cloning; vast banks of non-sentient clones held multiple copies of each living Kryptonian so that replacement parts were always available in the case of injury. All Kryptonians were effectively immortal and eternally young, and enjoyed an idyllic, sensual existence in an Arcadian paradise.

which is then followed by the snip you made.

I don't believe that there is a clear origin for Krypton. I would argue that it was traditionally a crystallised planet, hence the association with ice, but there is comic source material which point to Superman's Fortress of Solitude being an imitation of Krypton's environment, a lot of which is elaborated upon in the Extended Universe. The ice in which the spaceship was buried wasn't even from Earth. So... meh loose interpretations.

There are so many universes in both Marvel and DC, that it is hard to define anything as concrete. You would need to assume that every given source would need to be unique to its own verse.
 
Actually, that is revised Krypton. From the same source,




which is then followed by the snip you made.

I don't believe that there is a clear origin for Krypton. I would argue that it was traditionally a crystallised planet, hence the association with ice, but there is comic source material which point to Superman's Fortress of Solitude being an imitation of Krypton's environment, a lot of which is elaborated upon in the Extended Universe. The ice in which the spaceship was buried wasn't even from Earth. So... meh loose interpretations.

There are so many universes in both Marvel and DC, that it is hard to define anything as concrete. You would need to assume that every given source would need to be unique to its own verse.
It's been like I posted since Crisis infinite earths IIRC since the 1980s
 
Marvel represent and assemble!

With that out of the way: Almost Every thing live action (have not watched the latest TV show) after the monumental and inspiring and ... human take on Supes by the legendary Richard Donner was just plain bad. I do not care if he is Black/Yellow/Brown/White, but Warner have butchered the character and his legacy. And I am not even a Superman fan.

Miles Morales, Falcon and others have proven that what these characters represent and symbolises to (us) nerds and other ('normal') people are more important.

Bring on the Black Green Lantern!
 
It's been like I posted since Crisis infinite earths IIRC since the 1980s

Following which Earth? Crisis on Infinite Earths are a crossover of multiple Earths. As I said, it is very hard to define anything as concrete without establishing the verse wherein it is found.

For most non-comic readers, of original source, they were introduced to this Krypton,

m5.jpg

m1.jpg

m10.jpg


Assuming, by source material, Red suns have a cool surface.

It is in my view completely irrelevant to 'correctly' theorise what type of planet Krypton is exactly without establishing it in source particular to canon. The history and culture of Krypton has been revised many a time.

DC can decide tomorrow that all Kryptonians are black, and when they want a white Superman in thirty years time again, then the same type of arguments will be had all over again trying to reason for how it has been for the past thirty years why dare to change it now.

From my standpoint, there is enough current and relevant source material for a black Superman. It exists, and it is canon, but it is not from a popular source or Earth. Unless JJ Abrahams creates a new Superman with a unique and new story.

Calvin Ellis has been introduced in Crisis on Infinite Earths and there is Val-Zod introduced in New-52 which gives continuity to Earth-2 by succeeding Kal-El. Earth 2 is the original source material for the greater part of all DC universes, of which New-52 is a reboot.
 
Last edited:
Marvel represent and assemble!

With that out of the way: Almost Every thing live action (have not watched the latest TV show) after the monumental and inspiring and ... human take on Supes by the legendary Richard Donner was just plain bad. I do not care if he is Black/Yellow/Brown/White, but Warner have butchered the character and his legacy. And I am not even a Superman fan.

Miles Morales, Falcon and others have proven that what these characters represent and symbolises to (us) nerds and other ('normal') people are more important.

Bring on the Black Green Lantern!

Now I know exactly which source material is going to be exploited by JJ Abrahams. Kal-L is going Black Lantern. Val-Zod is going to pick up the Superman mantle, and strike down Kal-L who is corrupted.

You do know that John Stewart has been around since the 70s, right?
 
DC can decide tomorrow that all Kryptonians are black, and when they want a white Superman in thirty years time again, then the same type of arguments will be had all over again trying to reason for how it has been for the past thirty years why dare to change it now.
There is actually a reason why the creators (I think there was 2) took pains to create a mythos which gave the ice planet which explained why he was white. They were american (european) Jews who created a messiah from a desert planet, in this case a desert of ice.

You see it in his name as well, El is hebrew for God. Kal-El is literally a god and the son of God. [EDIT: the house of El being the house/lineage of God] There has in recent movies I have noticed been a great emphasis on him striking cross poses, dying, being resurrected, being addressed by his father as "my only son" and "sent to save them" and so on.

This ties in with the theory (give it the credence you will) that the S stands for Satan and he is actually an Anti-Christ figure. The funny thing is making him black will only reinforce this theory because it will identify him with Nimrod who was a decedent of Ham..... there is a lot of rabbit holes people go down trying to identify this future world king.
 
There is actually a reason why the creators (I think there was 2) took pains to create a mythos which gave the ice planet which explained why he was white. They were american (european) Jews who created a messiah from a desert planet, in this case a desert of ice.

You see it in his name as well, El is hebrew for God. Kal-El is literally a god and the son of God. [EDIT: the house of El being the house/lineage of God] There has in recent movies I have noticed been a great emphasis on him striking cross poses, dying, being resurrected, being addressed by his father as "my only son" and "sent to save them" and so on.

This ties in with the theory (give it the credence you will) that the S stands for Satan and he is actually an Anti-Christ figure. The funny thing is making him black will only reinforce this theory because it will identify him with Nimrod who was a decedent of Ham..... there is a lot of rabbit holes people go down trying to identify this future world king.
Man of Steel vs jet fuel
 
I hope they can pull it off. We haven't had a good Superman movie since the 80s. Henry Cavill is so boring to watch and the entire DC cinematic universe is just a hot mess right now.

Btw it's JJ Abrams
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X