South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yet in this articleTelkom invested $ 85 million in 2002 in SAT3/WASC/SAFE which makes it the major shareholder in the system, an investment that has paid great dividends to the telecoms giant. Telkom is also the system’s network administrator. The full system cost an estimated $ 650-million to develop.
So who's the Big Kahuna?VSNL currently owns 33% of SAT3, a higher percentage than Telkom’s share in the cable.
NeoTel would also be privy to this information.As far as I know, lying to a parliamentary body is an offence (correct me if I'm wrong...).
Get an MP to challenge her on this (Dene Smuts, are you listening?). The only way she can clear her name is if she produces the SAT3/SAFE usage figures. If she doesn't produce them (highly likely since this is Telkom's data, not hers AND they'll probably contradict her statement anyway), she should get nailed.
NeoTel would also be privy to this information.
And Verizon Business will also be privy to this information.NeoTel would also be privy to this information.As far as I know, lying to a parliamentary body is an offence (correct me if I'm wrong...).
Get an MP to challenge her on this (Dene Smuts, are you listening?). The only way she can clear her name is if she produces the SAT3/SAFE usage figures. If she doesn't produce them (highly likely since this is Telkom's data, not hers AND they'll probably contradict her statement anyway), she should get nailed.
OK, amend that to "highly likely since this is Telkom and NeoTel's data, not hers"
My point still stands. Challenge her on it. I'll bet anyone a beer that she either can't or won't provide the proof.![]()
Thanks - I wasnt aware they had a share of SAT3 - how much do they own?And Verizon Business will also be privy to this information.
Anyways her Poisonous Ivyness has never admitted to any wrong-doing, it's not like she will admit to being a lier now...
As much as I hate to admit it, her Poisonous Ivyness probably will need a whole new submarine cable to cater for the bandwidth needs of the SKA project, 80Gbits/s will not be sufficient, having said that, her Poisonous Ivyness is definitely lieing about SAT-3 currently running at full capacity!!!The Minister’s comments are thought to be part of her drive to promote the construction of a new submarine telecommunications cable system on the West coast of Africa.
While detailed information about this intended cable system is not yet available, it is closely linked to the needs of the projected square kilometer array telescope for which South Africa is bidding.
Verizon Business' parent company that used to be called MCI, is a SAT-3 shareholder.Thanks - I wasnt aware they had a share of SAT3 - how much do they own?
Thanks - I'm still curious though as to who has the biggest chunk. http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showpost.php?p=730399&postcount=4Verizon Business' parent company that used to be called MCI, is a SAT-3 shareholder.
On account of it being a secret shareholder's agreement, that even broken-promises-Padayache DMoCk Roy claims not to have access to, it's impossible to say with any certainty, but I think it is widely believed that Telkodemonopolies holds the single largest block of shares - whatever percentage that amounts to.Thanks - I'm still curious though as to who has the biggest chunk. http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showpost.php?p=730399&postcount=4
Perhaps - maybe rpm can spread some light - both articles were penned (can you still use that term?) by myadsl.On account of it being a secret shareholder's agreement, that even broken-promises-Padayache DMoCk Roy claims not to have access to, it's impossible to say with any certainty, but I think it is widely believed that Telkodemonopolies holds the single largest block of shares - whatever percentage that amounts to.
Allegedly yes, at least part of it, but I haven't seen that published anywhere...Perhaps - maybe rpm can spread some light - both articles were penned (can you still use that term?) by myadsl.
Didnt the agreement leak out some time back?
As far as I know, lying to a parliamentary body is an offence (correct me if I'm wrong...).
Get an MP to challenge her on this (Dene Smuts, are you listening?). The only way she can clear her name is if she produces the SAT3/SAFE usage figures. If she doesn't produce them (highly likely since this is Telkom's data, not hers AND they'll probably contradict her statement anyway), she should get nailed.
I would disagree - I believe Ivy is very much held accountable for her actions by her taskmasters at telkom.There is no such thing as accountability in South African politics. If there was, none of the idiots that make up our current government would be able to find a job.
Hi BwanaPerhaps - maybe rpm can spread some light - both articles were penned (can you still use that term?) by myadsl.
Didnt the agreement leak out some time back?
Thanks for the answer. Why the government would feel the need to shroud the whole SAT3 issue in secrecy from day 1 is beyond me. I assume they were readying their coffers even back then.Hi Bwana
I have no idea what exactly the agreement says. Maybe the initial investment is not directly related to shareholding percentages. I think Telkom’s status as the network administrator may also influence the total shareholding.
Regards,
RPM
Thanks for the answer. Why the government would feel the need to shroud the whole SAT3 issue in secrecy from day 1 is beyond me. I assume they were readying their coffers even back then.