- Joined
- Sep 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,787
- Reaction score
- 72
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Its just a shame that most of today's screens are 16:9 and not 16:10.
I'd love to get 1920x1200 resolution screens for my work, but they're just so expensive...![]()
I am also a fan of 16:10. But the 16:10 monitors is impossible to find.
But the 16:10 monitors is impossible to find.
Its just a shame that most of today's screens are 16:9 and not 16:10.
I'd love to get 1920x1200 resolution screens for my work, but they're just so expensive...![]()
Closer to 60 pixels. Plus auto hiding taskbars are annoying imo.I don't see the great need for a few extra pixels along the bottom. if it were that important you could just set your task bar to auto hide. I haven't measured but it probably accounts for that extra 120 pixels that are not available on full HD resolution.
Closer to 60 pixels. Plus auto hiding taskbars are annoying imo.
Yup. Like my brother's old Dell Precision 15.4" laptop has a 1920x1200 resolution even.1920 X 1080 still looks big on a 24 inch screen.