Most Attractive Race Chart

People try very hard to get their skin color to be the the right shade of black and white.

Face it, someone who is pitch black and someone who is white to the point where sun shining on him will blind you is considered to be less attractive. That's why people tan and use makeup, is it not?
 
I don't understand how you can find a certain race more attractive than others. There are beautiful and not-so-beautiful people of all races.

i also find myself looking more at the black ladies these days, though it's not about race, it's about a look
 
People try very hard to get their skin color to be the the right shade of black and white.

Face it, someone who is pitch black and someone who is white to the point where sun shining on him will blind you is considered to be less attractive. That's why people tan and use makeup, is it not?

That's where the coloureds get an edge. They are never too black or too pale :D

But then attractiveness is not only determined by skin tone. The whole package(facial features, body worx, etc..) has to be considered.
 
Of course someone must have lied. After all the result is not politically correct..

I guess it may well depend on how the questions were asked. This example highlights the issue from another survey "Dating in Sacramento"

Black women report they are not as enthusiastic to date outside of their race. However, after sharing with them the conclusions that were drawn from researching dating in the Sacramento area, they had a change of heart.

Black women interviewed were asked how they felt about inter-racial dating and most of them felt that dating outside of their race was no big deal but they worried about the sincerity in interest of their dating partner if the dating partner was not also Black.
 
i also find myself looking more at the black ladies these days, though it's not about race, it's about a look

Why do I get the feeling, some white people in here present themselves as non white and some non white as white. What a confusing situation WTF
 
Why do I get the feeling, some white people in here present themselves as non white and some non white as white. What a confusing situation WTF

STS is definitely white. The only one who misrepresents himself is Africaner.
 
Cape Town - The University of Cape Town (UCT) student newspaper, Varsity News, has received a vitriolic response on Twitter after it recently published a chart polling the most attractive race at the university.

The pie chart, titled “UCT votes on most attractive race”, lists the races as Caucasian, Indian, Coloured, African, Asian, and Mixed.

They are at University and they are still so ignorant as to think African is a race?

Idiots....
 
They are at University and they are still so ignorant as to think African is a race?

Idiots....

As the expression goes, sometimes you have to have gone to university to say something that stupid. Few things are more classic examples of that than a hippie varsity student, of which UCT has plenty.

That being said, research involving different races is not racism. Racism is racism.
 
It's apartheid's fault that black people find non-black people more attractive.

Know you are sarcastic...but more like apartheid and colonialism making people wish they were whiter...still even today in post apartheid SA and in India...whitening creams are a big seller there...just a fact
 
Complaint Lodged Over Student Article

The Young Communist League of SA has lodged a complaint over an opinion piece in the University of Cape Town's student newspaper, the SA Human Rights Commission said on Friday.

"We confirm we received a complaint on Thursday and we are busy looking into it. The respondents in this matter are the Varsity newspaper, the editorial staff, and UCT," said SAHRC spokesman Isaac Mangena.

The commission would study the complaint, list the allegations in letters to the respondents, and give them an opportunity to respond.

The commission would then deliberate and deliver a ruling timeously, depending on the co-operation of all parties.

The YCLSA UCT branch's complaint was based on a Varsity newspaper piece titled "Is Love Colour Blind?" published in the paper on Tuesday and written by Qamran Tabo.

Tabo explored interracial dating and surveyed sixty students, ten of each who said they considered themselves to be white, coloured, Indian, East Asian, "mixed" (bi-racial), or black.

A pie-chart accompanying the piece titled "UCT votes on the most attractive race" surmised that 38 percent of students apparently thought whites were the most "attractive" race, followed by coloureds, and Indians.

The lowest percentage by race was blacks (eight percent).

The piece was questioned by a number of individuals and organisations, including the UCT Student Representative Council (SRC), which said greater sensitivity should have been shown to an issue that had "painful historical significance".

Varsity news editor-in-chief Alexandra Nagel issued an apology in a press release on Thursday afternoon.

She said the newspaper's role was to act as a mediator and platform, and that the intention of the piece was for students to engage on a very prevalent topic.

It did not sanction hate speech, but endorsed the right to have an opinion and create a forum for response.

"I emphasise that the 'survey' conducted by the writer was for her personal insight and not that of a definitive, scholarly analysis. It was intended as a social commentary on the society in which she resides," Nagel said.

She formally retracted the title of the pie chart and said the chart should be read in conjunction with the article, and not as a separate piece.

The article was written in the opinions section and thus did not necessarily reflect the views of the newspaper, as stated in the online disclaimer, she said.

"I am aware of the controversy surrounding the sensitivity of race and I understand that the right to freedom of expression has its limits when used unnecessarily to discriminate against others, slandering religion, race, sexuality.

"However, Varsity feels that the writer was not abusing this right nor had the intention of issuing an attack on individual racial groups, but simply pinpointing a matter that is still affecting the lives of South Africans."

The YCLSA UCT branch, in a statement on Friday, rejected the newspaper's response and retraction of only the pie chart heading.

It stated that the article had incited racial division and caused psychological harm to students.

"We all deserve a [full] retraction and an apology from all concerned with the publication of this filth," the statement read.

"The article and its alleged survey were always leading to inculcate a culture of one race being the jewel of all others. It is despicable to read and should not have been published, even more so that we were without the full details of the survey."

It called on the university to dedicate a month to "race relations building" programmes and for the newspaper to dedicate a full page to racial issues in every issue until the end of year.

"If the editorial team is not able to fulfil the above requested feature of the newspaper, we as the YCLSA of UCT are prepared to do such an article."

UCT was not immediately available to respond.


Source : Sapa /je/hdw/ks/jk
Date : 05 Apr 2013 15:02
 
Know you are sarcastic...but more like apartheid and colonialism making people wish they were whiter...still even today in post apartheid SA and in India...whitening creams are a big seller there...just a fact

Would be interesting to see if colonialism in India made it desirable or if it existed before that even. Nfi where to look though.
 
Lets face it - if they survey had said black people were the most attractive, nobody would have said it was racist.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X