OrbitalDawn
Ulysses Everett McGill
Ok.Here's the point. IP only has value as far as people are prepared to honour it. "Owners" of IP will play up the property rights angle for all it's worth but at the end of the day intellectual property is only a concept. An idea is copied and propagated as soon as someone else hears that idea. Anything that can be digitised is similarly prone to dissemination. Basically once and idea is out there you'd have to be a retard to not try and copy it. If that idea means the difference between life and death or even just quality of life to someone they'd have to be suicidal or masochistic not to copy it. In fact, once you have the means to copy and idea you would have to hate yourself not to copy it if it meant the difference between suffering without the benefits of said idea or simply copying it and improving your life. The Chinese (please excuse my insensitivity with the attempt at approximation of the Chinese accent for humorous purposes) have quote rationally decided to actively ignore the self-defeating (for the human race) concept of intellectual property.
TL;DR it's just very anti-intellectual to suffer because of the concept of intellectual property. IP protects income streams not property.
Ah, right.
Well anyway, I caught Bruce's interview with the journalist that wrote this on 702 earlier. Seems there's a group of American Pharma executives that did concoct some cynical, backroom deal to subvert efforts of making medicine more affordable and rationalising the IP process with regards to medicine. Even going so far as to try and manipulate our relationships with other countries, for example.