CeeBee
Expert Member
surely they're covered... operative word being "up to" which means anything from zero to max....
its being used all over business, your perception of what that means to u is your problem imo, although me too not happy about the big diff in the user's meaning and the supplier's meaning.
still, like we've been told, if you get >1000kbps on a 1.8mbps connection, you should consider yourself among the priviledged few... but when u think about it, if your efficiency at the office is only 40-60% your boss will definately not consider himself lucky/happy!
Guess we should remember this is ZA and who's the original bandwith demon behind VC and MTN's inability to provide efficient, consistent speeds up to the 'up to' level... Telkom! Perhaps we are too eager to get the progress, when it will take a while to get there....
IMO I'd rather have the networks be quiet about 3.6 or 7.2, and IF I manage to get faster than 1.8 I'll be quite happy in ignorant bliss thinking, damn I got a good connection....
At least until most people achieve the faster speed consistently.
But, I guess, then they can't charge extra for the 'faster' connection...
Perhaps as an alternative, the networks should keep us informed, about which towers ARE upgraded and able, so we don't go expecting the perceived promised hi speeds, if the towers won't be able to handle it where u are...
I'd rather vote MTN to save the munny used for 7.2mbps towers, and for now rather use it to give a better quality true 1.8mbps connection, with properse uploads, and ping times... whats the use in being able to offer a lot of bum services, instead of a few great ones???
its being used all over business, your perception of what that means to u is your problem imo, although me too not happy about the big diff in the user's meaning and the supplier's meaning.
still, like we've been told, if you get >1000kbps on a 1.8mbps connection, you should consider yourself among the priviledged few... but when u think about it, if your efficiency at the office is only 40-60% your boss will definately not consider himself lucky/happy!
Guess we should remember this is ZA and who's the original bandwith demon behind VC and MTN's inability to provide efficient, consistent speeds up to the 'up to' level... Telkom! Perhaps we are too eager to get the progress, when it will take a while to get there....
IMO I'd rather have the networks be quiet about 3.6 or 7.2, and IF I manage to get faster than 1.8 I'll be quite happy in ignorant bliss thinking, damn I got a good connection....
At least until most people achieve the faster speed consistently.
But, I guess, then they can't charge extra for the 'faster' connection...
Perhaps as an alternative, the networks should keep us informed, about which towers ARE upgraded and able, so we don't go expecting the perceived promised hi speeds, if the towers won't be able to handle it where u are...
I'd rather vote MTN to save the munny used for 7.2mbps towers, and for now rather use it to give a better quality true 1.8mbps connection, with properse uploads, and ping times... whats the use in being able to offer a lot of bum services, instead of a few great ones???
Last edited: