backstreetboy
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2011
- Messages
- 49,397
- Reaction score
- 56,416
They will just set up a new company and then rinse + repeat. You are farting in a thunderstorm.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
They will just set up a new company and then rinse + repeat. You are farting in a thunderstorm.
So...rather just give up? Why not just ask their banking details and deposit your salary into their account every month then? It's a lost cause anyway?They will just set up a new company and then rinse + repeat. You are farting in a thunderstorm.
Untrue. Standard Bank gave me the exact details of the company who took my money three times after I picked it up. That trial was followed and pursued and ended up in a lawsuit against a fraudulent company who illegally instated debit orders on MANY people's accounts. HelloPeter link here: https://www.hellopeter.com/kga-life/reviews/unauthorized-debit-orders-91-2281196
In short, the company is/was called DisaStyle. Google it. They set up debit orders using a debit order company. They kept me in the loop and the end result was:
Dear My Name,
Thank you for your patience and allowing us the opportunity to investigate your complaint in respect of Disastyle’s unauthorised debiting of your bank account.
We have requested Disastyle to provide us with proof of the mandate upon which they acted to debit your account.
Disastyle could not provide us with a mandate, instead explaining that the debit order deduction happened by mistake. Due to an internal error they have presented the wrong files for debit order deductions.
We should point out at this stage that we were not satisfied with their response and decided to conduct a full audit and investigation of Disastyle.
Amongst the additional questions we asked during our investigation was how Disastyle obtained your banking details.
The explanation offered by Disastyle was that the account details were obtained previously through the sale of a different product at an earlier time, or alternatively that their posession of your account details was due to a capturing error on their side.
Disastyle’s answers failed to satisfy us. As such we have done the following:
• We have instructed Disastyle, as well as Insuregroup, to cease and desist from making any further debit orders;
• We have terminated our relationship with Disastyle;
• We have set up a meeting with the FSB with the purpose of ensuring that Disastyle does not continue their business practices elsewhere under a different guise or through another provider;
• We are in the process of compiling evidence that may assist the Commercial Crimes Unit of SAPS with an investigation of Disastyle.
Thank you again for your patience and bringing your complaint to our attention. If you have any questions, you are welcome to contact us directly.
Kind regards,
Their person's details.
Don't back down. Act, keep at it and stop these guys.
Not exactly. There are ways to mitigate it. Most banks have a saving pocket or move to Capitec and get access to 5/6 accounts. Chances of them hitting the one with my money in are next to nothing.So...rather just give up? Why not just ask their banking details and deposit your salary into their account every month then? It's a lost cause anyway?
I'm going there after 9, will post feedback...
This just pisses me off no end. Why do they charge banking fees on fraudulent transactions? Surely that is a crime itself.The transaction was reversed by the bank, so the nett loss was R5-00 (bank fees). I can have the bank put a permanent block on it, but then only for the R99 one; should they change it to R99-50, it will not be blocked as it will be seen as a new transaction. As said in post #12: the banks just process the instruction, and reverse it on your instruction. No confirmation on validity of the instruction...
My thoughts exactly, it's seems much easier.This lack of protection by the banks just pisses me off. Should just quit my job and start this scheme. Seems like a winner.
I am continuously surprised that the banks get away with this. If they do not have my authority how can they make a deduction? The cell 'phone companies do much the same too. I presume it is meant to save the banks some inconvenience, so the concept of charging you to reverse the theft is staggering.I got the same debit order R99 with reference "Nconnups15"
I'm with FNB and used the online banking site to "Reverse" and "Block future debit orders".
Thanks @FNB for sending me an SMS notifying me of a "New debit order" - which alerted me to the problem.
But, NoThanks to the banks for allowing ANY debit orders without the correct paperwork with signatures etc.
The banks will argue that it is your fault thus they not going to bother.I am continuously surprised that the banks get away with this. If they do not have my authority how can they make a deduction? The cell 'phone companies do much the same too. I presume it is meant to save the banks some inconvenience, so the concept of charging you to reverse the theft is staggering.
How can it be the customer's fault?The banks will argue that it is your fault thus they not going to bother.
I think you guys are being shafted by the banks over here. It can be different. In the UK if a direct debit goes wrong, the banks undertake to reverse it, no questions asked. British Gas carried on deducting for ages after I changed supplier, and when I got back the bank sorted it for me. No charge.The banks will argue that it is your fault thus they not going to bother.
Any advice, thanks.
UPDATE - So STD Bank reversed the R99, but the lady also told me 'it will probably happen again as they have my details now', so, not very comforting.
....
My conclusion is that the banks love these things, as apparently they charge the legit customer a reversal fee, can they be any more greedy?