As far as I can recall, the regulation is only for mobile operators.
Should include Neotel and Telkom.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
As far as I can recall, the regulation is only for mobile operators.
They are developing the label they will stick over the other label."Developing"? Why not just re-brand something already on the market? It will cost less, and you get a proven product.
Because they are a landline and not a cellphone operator.
Please if there was no contract then you would just have to pay for the device upfront - the chances that they could justify giving away free devices are non existentAs for the contract, there is the option to cancel, but you still have to pay for a device which you will not use. I don't like that.
And that seems like a bit of a lock in to me...
I concur that they're trying, but they could have tried more - but thats on the hardware sign of things...
As for the contract, there is the option to cancel, but you still have to pay for a device which you will not use. I don't like that.
And that seems like a bit of a lock in to me...
Please if there was no contract then you would just have to pay for the device upfront - the chances that they could justify giving away free devices are non existent
On the other hand they should allow you to purchase the device upfront for the same value - just so keep the contract whiners happy ...
There's hardware out there which does not cost as much as the old farty one they're dropping into the market currently.
The fact remains that if you want/need to cancel - you're stuck with hefty paperweight...size and price.
Ok the argument that they are forcing you to buy poor quality hardware is valid - but arguing that a contract is a bad idea based on the hardware just doesn't work: it sounds like you are suggesting that if the hardware was good enough then a contract would be acceptable?
So what we really need is the 'contract' option, upfront buying option and more choices of hardware![]()
Because they are a landline and not a cellphone operator.
Neotel themselves have promoted the fact that their device is portable. So if they are going to use their device's portability as a selling point. Why not ofer something smaller and more poratble. Obviously they are not a cellular provider, but because their devices can be carried around, a smaller device would make a good replacement for day to day cellphone use. Why pay over R2 a minute when you can pay 50c or whatever Neotel's rate is?
My feelings...feel right
My distaste is directed towards the fact that there is a 2 year contract in place.
I dislike contracts and I've wasted far too many keystrokes already down that road...
Hay further pointed out that Ethernet is a power hungry service and that this addition will mean a far shorter battery life than what is currently the case with the USB connectivity. The current devices have been praised for their particularly good battery life, something which Neotel would not have liked to sacrifice.
Hay further pointed out that Ethernet is a power hungry service and that this addition will mean a far shorter battery life than what is currently the case with the USB connectivity. The current devices have been praised for their particularly good battery life, something which Neotel would not have liked to sacrifice.
I am heartily sick of that stupid story now.
I can just imagine the meetings....
Chairman: We are getting flack over our stupid decision to go USB only
Manager1: Let us find an excuse
[lights go out - loadshed!]
Chairman: I know! Let us say that USB is less power hungry than ethernet - everyone will believe that!
[rounds of applause]
[curtains]