You are completely discounting the fact that there is disproportion in the colour of the victims who are mostly black.
why does it end with black people though?
what about other victims?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
You are completely discounting the fact that there is disproportion in the colour of the victims who are mostly black.
You are completely discounting the fact that there is disproportion in the colour of the victims who are mostly black.
Reading through some comments here - I can't help but think... If I was a rapist and I was told that the sentences for rapists would be stiffer, I would have a problem with it.
You are completely discounting the fact that there is disproportion in the colour of the victims who are mostly black.
Jon Qwelane was found guilty of hate speech in 2011.Oh goody! You've actually gone down this road. Now we get to roast you.
Provide some examples showing how the courts are colour blind by listing where a black person has been prosecuted for hate speech. We all know the white examples exist so unless you can provide something, you're talking rubbish. Remember, you made the claim that the courts are colour blind so it is up to you to provide proof.
Ah, how predictable. Nothing but pure BS as usual. What has this got to do with victims? We are talking about people committing acts of hate speech - ie. the perpetrators. Seeing as how you've decided to talk about disproportion, you would think that in a country with no shortage of anti-white hate speech and where blacks outnumber whites so heavily, you could provide something. But no, just more victimhood.You are completely discounting the fact that there is disproportion in the colour of the victims who are mostly black.
You are completely discounting the fact that there is disproportion in the colour of the victims who are mostly black.
Annnnnd the troll makes its appearance.
Nice pivot Hillary, the question was put to you to show the courts are colourblind, as you claimed.
What was Jon Qwelane's sentence/punishment? Did he also have to cough up 150k?Jon Qwelane was found guilty of hate speech in 2011.
Velaphi Khumalo has been taken to court for alleged hate speech.
TBH I think the courts predominantly are colourblind...
The bigger issue is actually getting the cases brought before the courts themselves.
The HRC as an example are completely and utterly NOT colourblind...
TBH I think the courts predominantly are colourblind...
The bigger issue is actually getting the cases brought before the courts themselves.
The HRC as an example are completely and utterly NOT colourblind...
This is actually what I was getting at. Thank you.TBH I think the courts predominantly are colourblind...
The bigger issue is actually getting the cases brought before the courts themselves.
The HRC as an example are completely and utterly NOT colourblind...
What was Jon Qwelane's sentence/punishment? Did he also have to cough up 150k?
Khumalo doesn't count if his case is pending.
What about the countless HRC complaints where no action is ever taken?
Free speech and police-state issues aside, If this law were to be applied fairly, that's one thing but I, for one, have ZERO faith in that happening based on the past year alone.
And has he?Jon Qwelane was ordered to pay R100 000
The way that things work is that the burden of proof is on you to prove that the courts are racially biased. It is virtually impossible to me, or anyone, to prove the negative.Nice pivot Hillary, the question was put to you to show the courts are colourblind, as you claimed.
Jon Qwelane was ordered to pay R100 000
Jon Qwelane was ordered to pay R100 000