Nikon D3000 bundle

Thanks for all the informative responses. Really appreciate it. Looks like it may be a good buy then.

One last question. For a noob like me who wants to take good quality pictures (not professionally) but who isn't really a photographer. Would you recommend this Nikon or perhaps a Sony or Cannon in the same price range?
 
Thanks for all the informative responses. Really appreciate it. Looks like it may be a good buy then.

One last question. For a noob like me who wants to take good quality pictures (not professionally) but who isn't really a photographer. Would you recommend this Nikon or perhaps a Sony or Cannon in the same price range?

I would like to know the same thing.

But from what I have read iceman, the D3000 is a really good noob camera because it is apparently really easy to use and set up a good shot.

It has the guide feature which literally guides you through setting up for the shot you want, whereas I think some of the different makes will require you to manually set up the shot, thus requiring you to know more about the camera.
 
i had a 450D with live view. can't say that i used it that much, in fact, i ended up preferring the view finder.
 
All things being equal a lens with a constant big aperture is just the thing to have, but many times money has to be factored in, and they do cost a lot more generally.

Live view has pros and cons, but you don't need it.

On SLR's you don't shoot by looking at the screen. You look through the viewfinder because you are then looking directly through the lens. "Live view" was introduced so that people coming from point and shoots would be more comfortable but:
1) The auto focussing is generally very iffy with live view enabled and someone using live view will most likely be using auto focus.
2) The shutter has to stay up the whole time for live view as opposed to just a "snap" so it could mean more dust on your sensor.
The autofocus is much slower. I think Live view does have some useful aspects though and I don't believe it is only to ease in people coming from compact cameras. But again it isn't essential.

I'm open to being convinced that keeping the mirror up while the camera is sealed leads to more dust on the sensor.

I also need a bit of help. I know next to nothing about photography. I currently have a 5.2 MP camera (basic cheap ones). I went to Makro and the salesman said that the D3000 only allows you to use the view finder and you cannot see the image on the screen until you click. Is this correct? This seems quite weird. Even my R1000 cheapie allows you to view the picture and then click. Is he talking nonsense?
Try the autofocus on an SLR versus on a compact camera. Not unusual for compact cameras to be slow and hunt more.

Also, is the D3000 good or should I rather put in more cash and get the D5000. Bear in mind that I just need to to take pictures on holiday or with the family. Wont really be using it very often.[/QUOTE]
The D3000 should suit your needs.

It sounds like you should rather get yourself a point and shoot cam, something like what you have but maybe a bit better. It sounds like a D3000 would be wasted.
I don't think so. An SLR using the automatic modes is still a far better, and in my opinion much easier to use, camera.

For a beginner, which one would you recommend, will be for normal family activities...

Nikon D3000 DSLR Twin Lens VR Bundle ---- R6 999

OR

Nikon D3000 Digital SLR Camera ---- R4 999
If that second one is only the camera, then you may as well get the twin bundle. You should be able to get the bundle with the 18-55 lens for a decent price though. If all you really want is a good, easy to use camera that you can just pick up and start shooting, then you may find yourself not using the second, longer lens in the twin kit. If you're willing to take the trouble to switch lenses when needed then you'll undoubtedly find situations where that second lens is just the thing to have around.
 
I bought the Twin VR kit last week and so far I'm really enjoying the D3000. We haven't really started using the SLR functions, but I'm eager to start learning. If you do wish to spend more for slightly better quality, I'd consider the Canon 1000D or 450D, since the IQ of those have been rated higher by reviewers. For our purposes (vacation pics and basic nature pics), the D3000 has done very well.
 
I bought the Twin VR kit last week and so far I'm really enjoying the D3000. We haven't really started using the SLR functions, but I'm eager to start learning. If you do wish to spend more for slightly better quality, I'd consider the Canon 1000D or 450D, since the IQ of those have been rated higher by reviewers. For our purposes (vacation pics and basic nature pics), the D3000 has done very well.

Nice flarkit, enjoy it!!

I am still deciding if I should take the plunge. :o
 
I bought the Twin VR kit last week and so far I'm really enjoying the D3000. We haven't really started using the SLR functions, but I'm eager to start learning. If you do wish to spend more for slightly better quality, I'd consider the Canon 1000D or 450D, since the IQ of those have been rated higher by reviewers. For our purposes (vacation pics and basic nature pics), the D3000 has done very well.

Nice :)
The 450d/500d are excellent but IMO the d3000 > 1000d.

I went to my free training last weekend @ Stellenbosch Photography Academy, some guy from Nikon spoke. Was very informative, learned a hell of a lot.
 
Appreciated, folks. These were done with the presets, so I haven't tried out the serious functionality yet. The quality of the detail which the camera captured astounded me.
 
So I take it you guys are happy with your buy :)
 
So I take it you guys are happy with your buy :)

Going from P&S to this is amazing. We probably won't be taking photos professionally, but the improvement in image quality and in the types of photos which we can take, is brilliant.

Wouldn't mind having a 300mm zoom :)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X