South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Actually if I had made that statement a whole bunch of people on this forum would be very quick to try and correct me. Good to know that hypocrisy is still alive and well.
I rest my case. 
@Prometheus, you conveniently forget that you did make such a statement claiming that v3g is incorrect and that v3g has to defend himself against your immensely superior knowledge of Vodacom's network & management systems where v3g got his facts from - that you claim is incorrect without any facts of your own to support your view of reality:Actually if I had made that statement a whole bunch of people on this forum would be very quick to try and correct me. Good to know that hypocrisy is still alive and well.I second that!Actually you are the one that disbelieves V3g's stats obtained from the system which everyone (myself included) think are realistic. Seeing that you don't believe these figures, the onus is on you to prove that these figures are incorrect. Lengthy rambling prove squat
Empty vessels make the most noise
Actually you have it backward.
It's the person who made the original claim (V3g) that has to prove it when it is questioned. My original point was how that can be an accurate figure in light of the real figures we do know and Vodacom's inability to give real time usage stats. His response was the usual condescending one as pointed out to him by another forumite. My guess is you didn't even see the facts I provided which is a lot more than he did.
You are absolutely correct, I did not see any of your facts bcos you never posted any facts.
With reference to which post(s)?ic/v3g said somewhere else. Even I do that now. I read a portion in a book sometime ago, which says, it is not what goes into the body, but, it is what comes out of it that makes the body sick. It could have been a medical journal not sure.
This is what they said. ic/v3g
First write then read, several times, correct/edit and then post.
Is what you said what you mean?, coz that is what they read/hear.
Ok, but you can understand how we might have trouble understanding you when we don't know which post(s) you're referring to...It was said in another thread and I cant remember where it is.
Why? - have you edited-in some facts since the last time I re-read all your [now 16] posts in this thread???
Ok, so are you agreeing to disagree then?I am through "debating" with you.
Ok, I think you're referring to one of v3g's posts.Got all the ouk's baffled.
I dont remember which thread and about what it was.
It was said that when you write a post or create a thread then,
Write it, leave it, reread it a couple of times & see if that is what you really want to say you might realise that it could be ok or not. and so on. It says in a book I have read never do things in anger wait cool down and reconsider.
Is there really life on other planet's??? Sorry not Pluto.
I'm finding it increasingly difficult to understand your posts lately, and I do understand Afrikaans, but your punctuation and strange spelling makes it even more difficult than usual.huh ??? what you trying to say, prom.? die is n' kwaai ou, hy laaik om ouens gal tebyt, as hy praat dan spring almal op hulle perdtjies en ry vir die vaale. nei man hy's die planet net so real soos ek en djy, vedomp ek hoop so!!
