Neoprod
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 21, 2004
- Messages
- 19,528
People blaming selection \ various off field issues need to answer a question honestly...if we'd executed to our potential on the field, would we have won? For me the answer to that is yes - and that then logically means that selection was not the problem. If we had taken the opportunities we created, we would have won easily...maybe we would have won more easily if the rain hadn't come down but that was not ultimately decisive.
Stop the blame game...you saw what the team could do in the QF, we couldn't reproduce that under pressure and we lost. It's that simple...selection, Alan Donald etc. have nothing to do with it. Even if Alan Donald gives the bowlers bad advice, after the first couple go the boundary, do you think Dale \ Vernon wouldn't change the plan of their own accord? They're not accountable to Donald...they're accountable to themselves, the captain, the coach, the public...least of all Alan Donald.
Stop the blame game...you saw what the team could do in the QF, we couldn't reproduce that under pressure and we lost. It's that simple...selection, Alan Donald etc. have nothing to do with it. Even if Alan Donald gives the bowlers bad advice, after the first couple go the boundary, do you think Dale \ Vernon wouldn't change the plan of their own accord? They're not accountable to Donald...they're accountable to themselves, the captain, the coach, the public...least of all Alan Donald.