Official Super Rugby 2014 Thread

[Fulcrum29]

Deysel has never struck me as a dirty player at all. I think in the moment he simply lashed out without even contemplating thinking about it. Perhaps lashed is the wrong word - he simply did what any forward would do to get free and defend.

But action needs to be taken against players for off the ball incidents such as this one that prompted Deysel's stomp. The initial infringing player also needs to be held accountable for dirty and foul play that results in an opponent lashing out at him...

He was released, then gave the blatant stomp (a prior stomp was given to get loose), the movement was also a bind with two Crusader players moving into Deysel, the Crusader on the right did not even know the ball was released and it is him who put the momentum into Deysel. This is up to the reviewing committee.

 

[MickeyD]

He was released, then gave the blatant stomp (a prior stomp was given to get loose), the movement was also a bind with two Crusader players moving into Deysel, the Crusader on the right did not even know the ball was released and it is him who put the momentum into Deysel. This is up to the reviewing committee.

3 week ban?

 

[ponder]

3 week ban?

I hope not.

 

[Fulcrum29]

3 week ban?

This is going to be interesting, however the SANZAR Judicial Hearing have given him a previous two weeks ban, and they love taking history in account. We should only be proud that the Sharks won, yes discipline, discipline...

 

[Creag]

You owe me a beer.

You gong to the conference? If there is beer to be bought, there I promise to swill one with you

 

[GreGorGy]

You gong to the conference? If there is beer to be bought, there I promise to swill one with you

I never miss it

 

[Creag]

I never miss it

Need to make sure uncle rpm has some brew on sale then...

 

[GreGorGy]

Need to make sure uncle rpm has some brew on sale then...

Sale? Usually sponsored by Vodacom

 

[Creag]

Sale? Usually sponsored by Vodacom

In which case the beer is in them.

 

[GreGorGy]

In which case the beer is in them.

Beer is in me too. Actually, there is a small chance I won't make it - a certain SP may have contracted me by then in which case attendance may be in jeopardy. But I think they understand the importance of my attendance, especially as a contractor. And they would insist I bankrupt the competition by drinking their funds

 

[OrbitalDawn]

Jannie and Adriaanse also played people off the ball, at least twice, and Mthembu at least once. Can't just call out one side.

 

[GreGorGy]

Can't just call out one side.

What competition have you been watching? In SuperRugby, you can - as long as it is the SA side.

 

[Fulcrum29]

Jannie and Adriaanse also played people off the ball, at least twice, and Mthembu at least once. Can't just call out one side.

Adriaanse is a dirty player and he got the winning try (game changer).

 

[Fulcrum29]

What competition have you been watching? In SuperRugby, you can - as long as it is the SA side.

You picked against the Stormers.

 

[Creag]

You picked against the Stormers.

Yeah. So did several others.

 

[Fulcrum29]

Yeah. So did several others.

Yeah, since it is upset weekend, the Stormers will probably win, extending my lead

 

[Creag]

Yeah, since it is upset weekend, the Stormers will probably win, extending my lead

Pertinent point.

 

[Fulcrum29]

Pertinent point.

I think the worst thing any rugby player can do before jogging up for his game is to check his SuperBru pick.

 

[GreGorGy]

You picked against the Stormers.

???

He is talking about infringements, not SuperBru. But if he was, my pick is FOR:

[85] Stormers v Force 17 May 17:05 (local)
17 May 17:05 (your time*) Stormers by 2

 

[Fulcrum29]

???

He is talking about infringements, not SuperBru. But if he was, my pick is FOR:

Oops, see my mistake, due to many "not picked yet" entries which threw my eyes. I know, but you surely debated infringements between a Stormer, a Bull and Shark supporter, there is only one losing SA side in this debate.