Oscar Pistorius: The Sentence

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wits law professor James Grant on Friday wrote on social networking site Twitter that Nel had asked for his advice about an appeal.

"I can confirm advocate Nel has consulted me for advice and assistance if he appeals. I have advised that he should appeal and agreed to assist."

WHAT??? Why didn't Nel consult our law guru, P.Hjul? :eek: Hjul always claims that he knows the law far better than Grant the clown.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WHAT??? Why didn't Nel consult our law guru, P.Hjul? :eek: Hjul always claims that he knows the law far better than Grant the clown.

Bwahahahahh :D Oh my donkey **** thats funny.
If people here were such experts they claim to be, they would not have stopped studying and would be practising attorneys / advocates / magistrates / judges / professors.
Thats why I take their long winded posts with a pinch of salt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bwahahahahh :D Oh my donkey **** thats funny.
If people here were such experts they claim to be, they would not have stopped studying and would be practising attorneys / advocates / magistrates / judges / professors.
Thats why I take their long winded posts with a pinch of salt

A ****ING TRUCKLOAD OF SEA SALT!!!! :D
 
Wonder what our resident experts will say :D
not sure which experts you are referring to but my position - as it always is - is give me the actual argument of person X to evaluate and comment on. You have been shown on this thread to be more than a little dishonest as to what is being said by whom as to prospects of the various aspects of proceeding forward.

You'll notice in the exchanges between PoisonedPawn and myself the question of whether the State can seek leave to appeal is well canvassed and whilst it would be a waste of public resources my sense of curiosity hopes that an application for leave to appeal is entertained by the SCA. You will also notice that in my exchanges with Albereth he and I disagree as to the viability of murder convictions under eventualis where there is other established criminal behaviour.

Funny enough we have gone from a multitude of noise claiming that the judgment was wrong to now a single academic who is very much in favour of revisiting precedent from the 1980s on a constitutional basis - which argument by the way is the same one used to pursue Wouter Basson who the bigot brigade have an issue with being subjected to an appeal.

Anyway you'll be able to read my full analysis of Prof James arguments in a few months time.
 
http://www.iol.co.za/sundayindependent/white-masculinity-since-1994-1.1770751#.VE1V-yLQpQs

:wtf:

Our basic proposition is that this trial has lifted a veil on the socio-cultural existential preoccupations of middle class Afrikaner men which includes love of guns, fast cars, blondes and other excesses amplified in the post-apartheid cultural landscape.

Although it may sound preposterous, there is also a growing sense that the demographic group in question has no regard for the rule of law, cynically believing “these are not our laws but laws meant to protect lawless blacks”, as some have opined on radio talk shows.

And so it comes as a shock when well-to-do white men like Pistorius are sent to jail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X