Photography lessons

ldmelsa said:
I can't tell either.

#1 looks better than #2
why?
#2 has boring flat light
#1 has nice soft light on the cat with dark background
it's better because of the light
not because the one is (was) raw and the other is jpeg

#1 = raw
#2 = jpeg
Click to expand...

So what's your point? Don't take boring photographs? This has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.

If you want to discuss the merits of one over the other, shouldn't the images be... um... similar?
 
Picked up my D40 this afternoon. Busy charging the battery. Got lots of reading to do.

Thx for all the advice!
 
arf9999 said:
So what's your point? Don't take boring photographs? This has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.
Click to expand...
Yes Andrew, that's my point. It's up to the photographer to make the photo. :)

Genius. said:
Picked up my D40 this afternoon. Busy charging the battery. Got lots of reading to do.

Thx for all the advice!
Click to expand...
Excellent! I love the D40. It's superb.

greg_SA said:
Sweet! Hope to get mine soon as well :)
Click to expand...
I wish I could get one, but I've got Canon lenses.
That said, I could sell my Canon stuff and get the D40. The main reason would be that amazing 18-200 VR! Wow, what a lens! If we Canon guys want something like that, we have to get the Sigma 18-200 OS. (which is great, I guess - It's just that 18-200 VR has had rave reviews)
 
ldmelsa said:
The main reason would be that amazing 18-200 VR! Wow, what a lens! If we Canon guys want something like that, we have to get the Sigma 18-200 OS. (which is great, I guess - It's just that 18-200 VR has had rave reviews)
Click to expand...

I have no idea how reliable this is, so take it with a pinch of salt, but rumor has it the EF-S 18-200 f/3.5-5.6 IS is on the way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X