Pinged / MWeb unsolicted marketing

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
24,731
Reaction score
27,676
I had an unsolicited call from Donovan of a company called Pinged doing marketing on behalf of MWeb. The number was a blocked number and it just showed private. The name Pinged was just used once and MWeb was used many times in the introduction.

The sales guy, Donovan, then tried to interest me in MWeb's ADSL service.

I stopped him before he could get into his sales pitch and asked him where he got my cell number. His reply was prompt: From the National Consumer Database.

Now of course, the "the National Consumer Database" reply is hogwash. This fictitious National Consumer Database simply does not exist and I made him aware of this. Eventually he started coming clean (but not quite) and admitted to obtaining telephone numbers from various sources, also mentioning ITC specifically (see comment in post footer) .

I made Pinged's Donovan aware that his was an unsolicited marketing call to me and I had not business with either Pinged or MWeb, also that I am on the DMA's do not call list.

I made him aware of the ECT ACT of 2002, Section 45 relating to unsolicited marketing communications and the Consumer Protection Act of 2008.

As such I asked that my details be removed from their marketing list immediately and that Pinged and/or MWeb never contact me again with marketing. However it still leaves the issue of where they obtained my details. Once again I asked where my details were obtained?

Pinged's Donovan could not answer me.

Donovan could also not supply me with their company number.

As such, on behalf of South Africa's consumers, I am now turning to MWeb in this public forum and asking them to investigate this issue and give feedback here regarding these unethical marketing practices.

MWeb is a member ISPA. This type of marketing, using devious practices, flies in the face of the ISPA Code of Conduct.

MWeb is also a member of the DMMA. At the DMMA's page on their memberCode of Conduct we find terms like transparency, fairness etc. There is no way this incident will meet with this CoC.

As such I ask MWeb, if you belong to these groups, why do you appoint third party marketeers that do not meet these requirements?

I tried finding Pinged's web site but was unsuccessful. They have no telephone number. As such, how can they legally represent you if they themselves cannot make the necessary tools available to abide by South African laws (CPA - opt out requirement?).

Mweb, you have a problem!

Looking forward to hearing from you here on these pages.

* Pinged's Donovan mentioned ITC as a source of contact details. ITC has long since become TransUnion (011 214 6000). I verified with what I thought I know, but needed to establish for a fact: TransUnion does not sell marketing/telephone number/address lists. In fact they are extremely curious about this incident. They would love to hear about companies making them the scapegoat in unethical marketing campaigns and have a team of lawyers at their disposal to defend their reputation.
 
Also had a call from "MWEB" in the last day or two. Wanted to sell me an uncapped package for R199 (1024kbps obviously) with "no limits at all, no caps, no speed limits, nothing!!!"... of course I'd love an unlimited-mbps R199 product, so I kept pressuring her for info and she was quite surprised when I informed her that the "one thousand and twenty four" of the product details refers to a speed limit.

Told her I preferred capped accounts. She tried selling me a capped account. Once again to be all surprised when I told her how much I pay at this stage to Afrihost for my 4GB of data. :D
 
I had an unsolicited call from Donovan of a company called Pinged doing marketing on behalf of MWeb. The number was a blocked number and it just showed private. The name Pinged was just used once and MWeb was used many times in the introduction.

The sales guy, Donovan, then tried to interest me in MWeb's ADSL service.

I stopped him before he could get into his sales pitch and asked him where he got my cell number. His reply was prompt: From the National Consumer Database.

Now of course, the "the National Consumer Database" reply is hogwash. This fictitious National Consumer Database simply does not exist and I made him aware of this. Eventually he started coming clean (but not quite) and admitted to obtaining telephone numbers from various sources, also mentioning ITC specifically (see comment in post footer) .

I made Pinged's Donovan aware that his was an unsolicited marketing call to me and I had not business with either Pinged or MWeb, also that I am on the DMA's do not call list.

I made him aware of the ECT ACT of 2002, Section 45 relating to unsolicited marketing communications and the Consumer Protection Act of 2008.

As such I asked that my details be removed from their marketing list immediately and that Pinged and/or MWeb never contact me again with marketing. However it still leaves the issue of where they obtained my details. Once again I asked where my details were obtained?

Pinged's Donovan could not answer me.

Donovan could also not supply me with their company number.

As such, on behalf of South Africa's consumers, I am now turning to MWeb in this public forum and asking them to investigate this issue and give feedback here regarding these unethical marketing practices.

MWeb is a member ISPA. This type of marketing, using devious practices, flies in the face of the ISPA Code of Conduct.

MWeb is also a member of the DMMA. At the DMMA's page on their memberCode of Conduct we find terms like transparency, fairness etc. There is no way this incident will meet with this CoC.

As such I ask MWeb, if you belong to these groups, why do you appoint third party marketeers that do not meet these requirements?

I tried finding Pinged's web site but was unsuccessful. They have no telephone number. As such, how can they legally represent you if they themselves cannot make the necessary tools available to abide by South African laws (CPA - opt out requirement?).

Mweb, you have a problem!

Looking forward to hearing from you here on these pages.

* Pinged's Donovan mentioned ITC as a source of contact details. ITC has long since become TransUnion (011 214 6000). I verified with what I thought I know, but needed to establish for a fact: TransUnion does not sell marketing/telephone number/address lists. In fact they are extremely curious about this incident. They would love to hear about companies making them the scapegoat in unethical marketing campaigns and have a team of lawyers at their disposal to defend their reputation.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have escalated this matter to be investigated and to ensure that you do not receive any more of these sorts of calls
 
Hi Sollie,

Our team would like to contact you regarding your query.
Could you please drop me a PM with your contact info and I will ensure that the relevant persons contact you.
 
Got an unsolicited marketing call from someone claiming to represent MWeb on Monday 27th May.
I'm on the opt out list for freak's sake.

MWeb, are you aware of how much such nonsense damages your brand?
 
Also can't find a company called pinged:

0.80 JIN PING GUO TRADING (Reserved)
0.80 PING AND QIAN COMPANY (Reserved)
0.80 PING E KGOLO TRADING AND PROJECTS (Reserved)
0.80 PING HAI TRADING (Reserved)
0.80 PING PONG PAY (Reserved)
0.80 PING SOCCER (Reserved)
0.80 PINGS PROPERTIES (Reserved)
0.80 PINGS PROPERTIES (Reserved)
0.80 QING PING TRADING (Reserved)
0.80 AFASIA TAI PING 2004/128751/23
0.80 BOR PING 1993/012763/23
0.80 CHANG PING TRADING 2010/144999/23
0.80 CHENG PING INTERNATIONAL TRADING 2004/083996/23
0.80 DI-PING LE DI-PINYANA TRADING ENTERPRISE 2009/177503/23
0.80 EI PING INTERNATIONAL TRADING 1996/007085/23
0.80 EN PING CLOTHING MANUFACTURER 1998/047302/23
0.80 EN PING TRADING 2007/152121/23
0.80 EN PING WATER SOLUTION 2007/104445/23
0.80 FOR PING COMPANY 1901/005351/07
0.80 FU PING SUPERMARKET 2010/126781/23
0.80 GAO PING GENERAL TRADING 2006/133365/23
0.80 GUO PING TRADING 2011/032470/23
0.80 JIN PING GUO TRADING 2013/064887/07
0.80 KANG PING TRADING 1999/005943/23
0.80 LEE PING PRODUCTIONS 2005/112431/23
0.80 LIN YOU PING LYP TRADING 2011/079068/23
0.80 LIU MING JIN PING TRADE 2001/029334/23
0.80 LIU PING IMPORT EXPORT 1996/043240/23
0.80 LONG PING 2009/026759/23
0.80 PAN PING ADVERTISING 1996/043164/23
0.80 PING AN 365 TRADING 2009/204788/23
0.80 PING AN TRADING 2006/212957/23
0.80 PING AN TRAVEL 2007/109607/23
0.80 PING CHI FOOD IMPORT AND EXPORT 2008/189812/23
0.80 PING COMPUTER SUPPORT 2005/136906/23
0.80 PING CONTRACTING SERVICES 1999/052874/23
0.80 PING E KGOLO TRADING AND PROJECTS 2013/009734/07
0.80 PING FENG TRADING 2009/202225/23
0.80 PING HU TRAVEL BAG PRODUCT 2002/096540/23
0.80 PING INTEGRAL COACH 2008/137878/23
0.80 PING INVESTMENTS 1990/021371/23
0.80 PING IP TECHNOLOGIES 2010/164111/23
0.80 PING IT 2011/144787/07
0.80 PING LADY TRADING 2011/079904/23
0.80 PING LAN TRADING 2008/166663/23
0.80 PING NING TRADING 2011/081067/23
0.80 PING POINT TRADING 2007/068722/23
0.80 PING PONG COMMUNICATIONS 2005/000066/23
0.80 PING PONG ENTERTAINMENT CENTER 2009/175987/23
0.80 PING PONG PAY 2012/131981/07
0.80 PING PONG PLAYSCHOOL 2008/052168/23
0.80 PING PONG PRODUCTIONS 2003/079479/23
0.80 PING QIN IMPORT AND EXPORT TRADING 2010/006866/23
0.80 PING RENTAL 2010/106941/23
0.80 PING SENG PLASTICS 2000/009956/23
0.80 PING SENG PLASTICS 1987/070435/07
0.80 PING SOCCER 2013/027404/07
0.80 PING SPORTS 2012/151590/07
0.80 PING TAI DEVELOPMENT TRADING 2008/227206/23
0.80 PING TAKEAWAY 2005/072579/23
0.80 PING UPHOLSTERY SUPPLIERS 2003/009987/23
0.80 PING WANG TRADING 1998/058589/23
0.80 PING XIN TRADING 2008/236698/23
0.80 PING YI CLOTHING 2001/013493/23
0.80 PING YUN TRADING 2007/155295/23
0.80 PINYANA GA E RE PING TRADING ENTERPRISE 2010/023680/23
0.80 QING PING TRADING 2012/184360/07
0.80 QIU PING CLOTHING 2009/141616/23
0.80 SHENG PING TRADING 2012/147814/07
0.80 SHENG PING TRADING 2010/067852/23
0.80 SOUTH AFRICA TAI PING YANG INDUSTRIAL TRADING 1999/044254/23
0.80 SOUTH AFRICA-JIAN PING IMPORT AND EXPORT 1994/021949/23
0.80 TAI PING RESTAURANT SERVICES 2001/004622/23
0.80 THE PING CONSULTING SOLUTION 2004/060509/23
0.80 THE PING'S GOLF ESTATE 1998/059500/23
0.80 XIANG PING TRADING 2005/148459/23
0.80 XIAO PING 1995/012898/07
0.80 XIE WEN PING TRADING 2010/151603/23
0.80 XING PING TRADING 2007/054383/23
0.80 YAN XIU PING TRADING 2010/130042/23
0.80 YI-PING IMPORT AND EXPORT 1999/020792/07
0.80 YOU PING TRADING 2011/074207/23
0.80 YUE PING CLOTHING 2005/090134/23
0.80 ZHAO PING SHI 2009/080813/23
0.80 ZHEN PING TRADING 1996/031829/23
0.80 ZHENG LI PING TRADING 2010/060491/23
0.80 ZHUANG PING TRADING 2009/190574/23

Unless its one of these two:

0.80 PING IP TECHNOLOGIES 2010/164111/23
0.80 PING IT 2011/144787/07
 
Hi MWEB Guy, apologies for disappearing there on you. Also thank you for taking this upstream.

For the sake of fairness, I'm sharing what has occurred since.

I was contacted by MWeb on two occasions. The first time to tell me they were looking into this as they were concerned that this can happen with the MWeb brand attached as it goes against their own business ethics, the second time to tell me what had happened.

"Pinged" is is actually Pingd, a division of the Ignition Group. They are new MWeb business partners
http://www.ignitiongroup.co.za/corporateProfile/telco/pingd
http://www.pingd.co.za/

There is a marketing list that meets the accepted marketing standards.
The operator, Donovan that called me, was new and had not undergone the full training.
The hogwash replies to my questions, was not in line with the accepted principals of their marketing.
The operator Donovan had actually mis-dialed the number he was supposed to dial, ending up with me.
(I accept this, based upon repeating digits)
The issue was discussed at management levels between these two companies to ensure it does not happen again as it is not acceptable to MWeb.

I accepted this answer and appreciate the trouble MWeb went to, also respecting and believing MWeb's desire to do ethical business.

However I reserve my right to judge any company that allows new staff to contact the public, having not educated these staff beforehand and thus allowing them to abuse those they call by lying and falsely incriminating third parties like the TransUnion (or "ITC" as Donovan said). This is reckless and discredits ethical marketing in South Africa. I trust this has been an educational process for Pingd.

Thank you once again MWEB Guy for seeing this through the system, also to MWeb as a company for taking this seriously and looking into this.
 
Mweb is still doing this crap! Just got a call from these guys and it wasn't the first one either! I have registered on the opt out database so why the hell am I getting these calls.

How the hell do I get them to stop?
 
I also received a call yesterday from someone (didn't bother get their name) trying to sell me adsl/3g from Mweb and I can confirm I used to be a Mweb client long ago.
 
I also received a call yesterday from someone (didn't bother get their name) trying to sell me adsl/3g from Mweb and I can confirm I used to be a Mweb client long ago.

Same here. I dropped them a while ago.

I am now telling anyone who will listen to stay the hell away from Mweb.
 
So was it misdialled numbers? This seems to be the same excuse I got from Exact Mobile and Planetfitness - both addressing me on a first-name basis but once ECT/DMMA was mentioned they quickly went quiet and making up the excuse of a wrong number (although the operator initially said that he had been given a cold-calling list).

Over the past 12 months I have challenged every company which conducted unsolicited marketing and none of them complied with DMMA or ECT and were unwilling to provide source of the details and mentioned "You have been removed". When following the PAIA route, they will just ignore you and brush you off.
 
I know this is a somewhat dead thread, but it's one of the first results that pop on Google. So, apologies for the resurrection.

I've just had my third unsolicited call from Ashraf at Pingd, also trying to sell me an uncapped ADSL connection from MWeb. However, they failed to realise or know that I've been an MWeb customer for over a year, and that I'm already on an uncapped connection.

There is a marketing list that meets the accepted marketing standards.
The operator, Donovan that called me, was new and had not undergone the full training.
The hogwash replies to my questions, was not in line with the accepted principals of their marketing.
The operator Donovan had actually mis-dialed the number he was supposed to dial, ending up with me.
(I accept this, based upon repeating digits)
The issue was discussed at management levels between these two companies to ensure it does not happen again as it is not acceptable to MWeb.

It would appear as if Pingd either paid lip service to MWeb, at the supposed management meetings they would have had to discuss this, or they have a habit of not training their operators.

MWeb, if you're still dealing with this company, I really think it's time to cut ties with them. It really doesn't do good things for your image :(
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X