Prostate cancer

In other news on the same website routine PSA testing is bad....
"results showing that using PSA blood testing to screen for prostate cancer can slightly reduce the risk of men dying from the disease (meaning 1 in 1000 fewer men die from the disease), but may miss aggressive cancers in some men, and over diagnose the disease in others.
The results are important. They reinforce the evidence from another large, long-term screening trial that came to the same overall conclusion. That trial was the basis for our view that PSA blood testing does reduce deaths from prostate cancer, but also has the potential to cause harm to a large number of men and misses too many significant cancers. "

I mean... even if the doc detects an enlarged prostate with the finger test the next step is PSA blood tests. If there's elevation it's on to a biopsy. Biopsy is an outpatient procedure and it's pretty darn quick.

Fact remains that the PSA test is more reliable than the finger test. So all that study is showing is that more men were made aware of something picked up by the PSA test. They had further investigations in the form of a biopsy and turns out it was nothing or it was benign. No massive loss unless there's some rare complication with the relatively simply biopsy procedure.

While it would be lovely to have a more effective test the reality is there is none. The PSA test is the best you can do. Get it done guys. Quick blood test once a year to potentially save your life. It's worth it.
 
Following/subbing to this.

I turn a landmark age next year, my Mum died of Colon Cancer last year. It has been strongly suggested that I get my prostate checked out.

I am dreading it for many many reasons :( :(

Oh yes, **** Cancer!

Had death of colon ca in my family too a few years ago. The 'specialist' was too lazy to do a proper colonoscopy and missed the polyp a couple years prior to that. Sadly another specialist suspected that given who did the procedure but did not say it in a way to say that a repeat should have been done. A third now retired specialist did not think a repeat procedure was necessary. A fourth famous radiologist missed the diagnosis on CT done for a different reason. Another famous specialist completely disregarded the CT results. Unfortunately by the time I got hold of the results it was too late. That's South African medicine for you. We don't sue enough and sometimes our doctors don't practice enough defensive medicine.

So you can go for all the screening procedures but still end losing out when you have people who sometimes don't put in 100% effort. The devil's always in the details.
 
Check out these 2x threads from a bygone era (‘09). Compare the advice given during that time to what was mentioned now.

2009, A Simpler Time.



NGL I was tempted to Le Bump however it’s not fitting so I reined it in.
 
Don't think you need the finger up the bum unless your PSA raises any flags
I think if you're elevated these days they send you straight for a scan, prob don't even probe anymore.
In other news on the same website routine PSA testing is bad....
"results showing that using PSA blood testing to screen for prostate cancer can slightly reduce the risk of men dying from the disease (meaning 1 in 1000 fewer men die from the disease), but may miss aggressive cancers in some men, and over diagnose the disease in others.
The results are important. They reinforce the evidence from another large, long-term screening trial that came to the same overall conclusion. That trial was the basis for our view that PSA blood testing does reduce deaths from prostate cancer, but also has the potential to cause harm to a large number of men and misses too many significant cancers. "

Are you saying this vs getting "felt" up there for cancer? Or that PSA itself misses cancers that could occur in other parts of the Body and people don't get that checked?
 
I think if you're elevated these days they send you straight for a scan, prob don't even probe anymore.

Are you saying this vs getting "felt" up there for cancer? Or that PSA itself misses cancers that could occur in other parts of the Body and people don't get that checked?
Basically the PSA test can in some people prompt unwarranted surgery, aka false negative and also miss some serious forms of aggressive prostrate cancer that don't get picked up by PSA tests but will be picked up by the finger test. Unfortunately with these tests it's not a one size fits all situation.

 
Basically the PSA test can in some people prompt unwarranted surgery, aka false negative and also miss some serious forms of aggressive prostrate cancer that don't get picked up by PSA tests but will be picked up by the finger test. Unfortunately with these tests it's not a one size fits all situation.

Ah ok i see. Interesting.
 
Basically the PSA test can in some people prompt unwarranted surgery, aka false negative and also miss some serious forms of aggressive prostrate cancer that don't get picked up by PSA tests but will be picked up by the finger test. Unfortunately with these tests it's not a one size fits all situation.


I doubt anyone's going to rush off to surgery based on one PSA test
 
PSA is so cheap these days I do that annually without any finger up the bum action.

Had those since my twenties already because back them the blood test was like R2k a pop.
 
When I had my vasectomy recently, me and the Urologist chatted about the prostate (I'm not there yet, but the topic came up). He said that he had multiple cases where the bloodwork showed no signs, but upon physical examination, he discovered problems, so he said, the old-fashioned way is the most thorough, especially if you want to detect it early.

He was like, "why are men so scared, as though they are getting violated", I laughed nervously back..
 
When I had my vasectomy recently, me and the Urologist chatted about the prostate (I'm not there yet, but the topic came up). He said that he had multiple cases where the bloodwork showed no signs, but upon physical examination, he discovered problems, so he said, the old-fashioned way is the most thorough, especially if you want to detect it early.

He was like, "why are men so scared, as though they are getting violated", I laughed nervously back..
Time to change doctors I would say, unless...
 
When the time arrives, I shall think very hard about which guy puts his fingers up my batty..
Or you could, I don't know, find a girl doctor. Seems like there's some kind of subconscious predisposition going on. But I'm not judging, if you really want a guy then go for it...
 
Or you could, I don't know, find a girl doctor. Seems like there's some kind of subconscious predisposition going on. But I'm not judging, if you really want a guy then go for it...
Female urologist, thought that was a myth..
 
When I had my vasectomy recently, me and the Urologist chatted about the prostate (I'm not there yet, but the topic came up). He said that he had multiple cases where the bloodwork showed no signs, but upon physical examination, he discovered problems, so he said, the old-fashioned way is the most thorough, especially if you want to detect it early.

He was like, "why are men so scared, as though they are getting violated", I laughed nervously back..
Very sound advice from your urologist.
My bloodwork showed nothing but the subsequent finger test did suggest that something was not right. The analysis of the tissue removed during the TURBT procedure showed malignant cells. The Gleason count was 2 which currently is not considered prostate cancer. Since then I have been going for a yearly checkup.
I really cannot see why people are reluctant to see a Urologist. Surely if my wife can go for a PAP Smear yearly why should I shy away from a simple procedure that can safe my life.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X