Solitude
Executive Member
so a country's most popular sport should rank the highest internationally?
The more people play, the bigger the pool of players to pick from.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
so a country's most popular sport should rank the highest internationally?
waarvoo kyk djy my soe?
so a country's most popular sport should rank the highest internationally?
Still struggling with numbers, as always (are you drunk now?)
View attachment 378112
With a population of 4 million.
Bloody troll.
Not necessarily but there is a correlation for team sports (look at how many South American countries are in the top 20 or so of the FIFA rankings). The country's sports bodies have to be able to translate that passion and love of the game into performance at the national level (something we're less and less able to do in rugby and have rarely managed in soccer).
The point of the comparison I made was to show you why comparing NZ and SA is inaccurate. The amount of funding, participation, general attention given to soccer in NZ would be tiny compared to here.
The point of the comparison I made was to show you why comparing NZ and SA is inaccurate. The amount of funding, participation, general attention given to soccer in NZ would be tiny compared to here.
Are you implying the genetic make-up plays a role?I see.
Kinda like the Jamaican sprinting team vs the American sprinting team?
Don't watch football really but the racial make-up doesn't bother me in the slightest, are you happy with them?
I see.
Kinda like the Jamaican sprinting team vs the American sprinting team?
You always get people asking "look at Bafana's racial composition" whenever the quota issue in the previously white codes is brought up. It is an ignorant observations of course but does happen. What it does point to is that there is either a large majority or vocal minority wishing for white teams to remain white and any attempt at balancing even if merit based will be dismissed as quota. We already see it. All of the Protea players of colour who turned out to be good enough on merit started out being dismissed as quota based.
I must have watched a different match. Stormers had like 6 in their starting 15 . Lions had only 3.But the Stormers only had 2 black guys on the field that night.
Lions way more.
But then isn't that a perfect argument against quotas. If you didn't have them you wouldn't have to doubt them in the first place.
In any case, is there any evidence to suggest that the 'quota' players who have proven to be successful would not have been selected had there not been quotas?
I must have watched a different match. Stormers had like 6 in their starting 15 . Lions had only 3.
He was drunk, OK.... :erm:![]()
It's hard to prove players are being overlooked on the basis of their melanin content. My opinion is there are entrenched mindsets that may be actively working against the advanced of players of colour. The officials will never do it overtly but the fans certainly show it.
A drunk speaks *** all the time.
Now sod off.
A drunk speaks a sober mind.
Now sod off.
If their sprint teams represented their demographics, it would be a mostly white team. According to your logic, this would be fair.
Funny you should mention the Americans.
If their sprint teams represented their demographics, it would be a mostly white team. According to your logic, this would be fair.
And that is the problem.
Seems like je$$ie_jame$ missed your post...