R300 fine for smacking your kid

Should parents be allowed to use restrained physical force when repremanding kids?

  • No

    Votes: 12 9.0%
  • Yes

    Votes: 118 88.1%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 4 3.0%

  • Total voters
    134
You have statistics? I'd be interested to see the historical data on this.

My old high school, in Milnerton, has had a lot of bad publicity in the local rags recently about violence and drug usage at the school. The same appears to be happening to Table View HS, if you believe the local
rags they drop in your post box weekly. When I attended HS we never
had issues like this, no-one in my year did drugs, the worst case of violence
was when a Matric's younger Std6 brother had his head dunked by his
buddies in a toilet and corporal punishment was just being phased out.
Don't recall ever any serious BS happening in our school. There was
one case of attempted rape (schoolboy gave booze to a girl and then
tried to assault her indecently) in a younger year but everyone knew about it and everyone was shocked by it,
I believe the asailant had some serious threats to his health from the other students.
 
Government is confusing discipline with abuse. R300 is never going to stop some drunken bastard beating his wife and kids to a pulp.
 
Assault is against the law, no matter what you prefer to call it, spanking, beating, klapping... it all boils down to one thing, physically injuring someone against their will.
Bullsh1t. Why did they get the spanking in the first place? Something was done against a parent's will! :D

I'm pretty sure some people should be fined R300 for just breeding...
Amen!

as soon as corporal punishment was phased out of schools, look how unruly most students have become.
Same goes for the now "slapgat" defence force. No more "opf*k" in any way whatsoever or the so-called "soldiers" strike...

If you're wondering why you're kids are constantly on drugs, have abortions at the age of 14, and steal booz money from you, then it's because you don't teach them respect, and because this pathetic "syndrome" called human rights have doomed this world to a sorry, lost world
As previously stated elsewhere in this thread "My roof, my rules".
Anyone going against rules shouldn't have "human rights", as they took the right to make and enforce rules away from the rule maker.
 
Consult the Bible first on matters that matter

Read your Holy Bible for advice on the matter. Remember serve God first and then the rules of the Government, it cannot be the other way around:

Pro 23:13 says it like this in the different translations:

(Afrikaans) Hou die tug nie terug van die seun nie; as jy hom met die roede slaan, sal hy nie sterwe nie.

(Darby) Withhold not correction from the child; for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die:

(ESV) Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you strike him with a rod, he will not die.

(Webster) Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die.

(YLT) Withhold not from a youth chastisement, When thou smitest him with a rod he dieth not.
 
Read your Holy Bible for advice on the matter. Remember serve God first and then the rules of the Government, it cannot be the other way around:

Pro 23:13 says it like this in the different translations:

(Afrikaans) Hou die tug nie terug van die seun nie; as jy hom met die roede slaan, sal hy nie sterwe nie.

(Darby) Withhold not correction from the child; for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die:

(ESV) Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you strike him with a rod, he will not die.

(Webster) Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die.

(YLT) Withhold not from a youth chastisement, When thou smitest him with a rod he dieth not.

And there goes any form of logic or reasoning straight out of the window! :D

Quoting the bible does not constitute a valid argument... :sick:

What would you do if I start quoting from Moby Dick? It's also a book, but at least we know who wrote it... ;)
 
The FF Plus welcomed the news that the controversial section 139 of the Children’s Amendment Bill which will be accepted in Parliament later this week, has been separated from the remainder of the Bill.

The news that the controversial section which would have scrapped the common-law right of parents to discipline their children, will first be held back, was made known this morning during a meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Social Development in the National Assembly.

The FF Plus’ spokesperson on Youth Affairs, Mr. Willie Spies, said in his reaction that the news is a victory for minority parties who were vehemently opposed to the proposed measure. The committee had taken its decision following a proposal from the ACDP’s Ms. Cheryl Dudley.

It also became known last week that the ANC caucus was seriously divided about the proposed measure. If the law had been accepted as it stood, any parent who gives his/her child corporal punishment would be found guilty of a misdemeanour because the common law defence of “reasonable discipline” would no longer exist. According to an earlier submission of the Department of Justice at the portfolio committee, a typical fine would be R300 per incident.

Spies said the government is looking for trouble if it plans on criminalising millions of right-thinking parents while the state fails its obligation to safeguard the community from criminals.

The controversial section will most probably be submitted again next year, but in the short term, Christians, religious groups and minority parties who had been opposed to the section, have reason to celebrate an interim success in the legislative process.

via e-mail
 
Yeah I heard it on the radio on the way home as well, so we are all safe for another year and then everyone can panic again :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X