It does not matter how you lot want to argue the facts.
It COSTS to build infrastructure. It COSTS to maintain infrastructure.
The more expensive the infrastructure is, the longer the pay back period has to be to make it affordable.
The fact is the service IS hugely useful and I use the Gautrain whenever I have to travel to places served by a Gautrain bus route and a station. It ALWAYS works out to be the better option for me on a personal level, when compared to the alternative, which would be to use the longest parking garage in the country.
It is NOT suitable when travelling to places beyond its designated service area. THEN the parking garage unfortunately wins, even when taking into account the monetary value of the time spent in the parking garage. It is a great relaxing trip, efficiently run and is an absolute pleasure to use.
Those of you that want to analyse these things, have a look at the analyses done for just about every underground rail system in the World, and when you have completed that analysis, and compared the results with the Gautrain, THEN come back and tell us if the Gautrain project is better or worse. That IS the ONLY analysis that is worth debating.
What needs to be done is to improve the inter-action between bus systems operating in Gauteng, so that other bus systems can also provide feeder services for Gautrain. The next thing is to provide for trains on a 24-hour basis (less frequently for sure, but not NO trains), not cut off after about 20:00 at night.
IF it was possible I should be able to get onto a bus at a bus-stop, 3 minutes from my home, change over to a Gautrain bus where the routes cross, and I WILL not then use anything else.
Here IS a valid complaint we should be taking to our council representatives --- more work is required to properly integrate the existing transport systems in Gauteng to get optimal use of all of them.