Resignation Letter

Pitbull said:
Qualifications and experience does that for you, no need to even ask ;)
That is why Kroll does the checks on the qualifications.

But yes, I think every recruiter has their own way of doing things
Click to expand...

It's about separating the cream of the crop. Many applicants might be able to perform the job - but finding one who will be able to perform it the best is what you're after, surely? If you were merely basing your decision on trust, their qualifications and Kroll, then why the need for an interview in the first place? Being able to perform a role doesn't equate to being able to perform it really well. This is where references help...
 
Last edited:
DJK said:
It's pretty much a give-away if an ex-boss states that he/she cannot say any more apart from confirming that the person in question was employed for a specific duration, at a specific salary in a specific capacity...;)
Click to expand...
Yet that is called a standard reference and one which is issued on a regular basis by blue chips.
 
Sackboy said:
Yet that is called a standard reference and one which is issued on a regular basis by blue chips.
Click to expand...

Yes, we've covered that already in this thread. I'm well aware of standard references which is merely a confirmation of employment. The gist of my argument is actually making proper contact with the company for a more in-depth reference. This point's been covered already though...
 
DJK said:
Yes, we've covered that already in this thread. I'm well aware of standard references which is merely a confirmation of employment. The gist of my argument is actually making proper contact with the company for a more in-depth reference. This point's been covered already though...
Click to expand...
The point I'm trying to squeeze in here (if you don't mind) is that a simple reference and nothing personal is not a sign of a bad employee or a dark history. It could just be company policy and is very much so in the UK/EU banking world. Personal references are not allowed in fact.
 
Sackboy said:
The point I'm trying to squeeze in here (if you don't mind) is that a simple reference and nothing personal is not a sign of a bad employee or a dark history. It could just be company policy and is very much so in the UK/EU banking world. Personal references are not allowed in fact.
Click to expand...

Having worked in the EU banking world I know this to be the case, however I still managed to get personal references telephonically over there. My point being that you'll never know unless you ask - I might be a little harsh on that front by making an assumption, however it can be deduced relatively easily if a candidate's previous employers consistently refuse to give out references. 4 sparking ones and a single "against company policy" I have no issue with. All 4 refusing to give a personal reference though should raise the eyebrows...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X