RIP Charlie Kirk

PowerfulMagicalEvil said:
cancel-culture-v0-mw8jam5ua5pf1.jpg
Click to expand...
Yeah the roles have been reversed in yankeeland. The right-wing and anti-wokes have become the annoying group that wants to cancel things and incessantly whine about everything.
 
Last edited:
Vorastra said:
Bruh...pardoned in 2025. No one was charging them with insurrection lmao
4 years democrats tried running after them, and not once did they charge anyone with insurrection.

If they were every going to, they had 4 years to do it, and never did.
Click to expand...

Ahhh, we're playing that game. Cool. I'll royally admit that they didn't attempt to charge them with insurrection. Would you be happy with "seditious conspiracy"? Because those convictions still stand for those "proud boys" and "oathkeepers". They were found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Sure, they had their sentences commuted and were pardoned. But in the legal record, they still stand.
 
Speedster said:
The gun party all left their guns at home when they attempted insurrection?
Click to expand...

Of course. It was just a stroll through the capitol gardens. And they were just doing some pro-bono QA testing on the capitol police's helmets, making sure they were actually up to spec.
 
Bewlen said:
Ahhh, we're playing that game. Cool. I'll royally admit that they didn't attempt to charge them with insurrection. Would you be happy with "seditious conspiracy"? Because those convictions still stand for those "proud boys" and "oathkeepers". They were found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Sure, they had their sentences commuted and were pardoned. But in the legal record, they still stand.
Click to expand...
Yeah we're playing the game of...no one was charged with insurrection, and you're pretending like someone magically was still going to be FOUR YEARS afterwards when democrats made it their mission to punish even the smallest crimes committed that day.
 
Vorastra said:
Yeah we're playing the game of...no one was charged with insurrection, and you're pretending like someone magically was still going to be FOUR YEARS afterwards when democrats made it their mission to punish even the smallest crimes committed that day.
Click to expand...

Seditious conspiracy convictions. Littering. Public indecency for taking a wee in the rose bushes. Meh, same-same.

Sureeeeeeeeeeee :thumbsup:
 
Craig_ said:
I don't even think you know wtf you're saying there.

Your defense of Maga is odd, you're a brown gay man, do you really think they give a toss about you Shaun? Just look at the type of people on this forum that supports Trump, I admittedly know very little about US politics, and even I can see something is off here.

This is no different to the lgtvq support of Palestine, it's weird and unnatural.

But you do you my friend.
Click to expand...
Why is it always this "with us or against us" mentality? A gay guy or a brown guy defending common sense doesn't automatically make them maga or Donnie lovers, wtf.

All the black and gay people coming out and defending this guy all acknowledge that whatever lies are being peddled about him is BS. They agreed with him on some things and not others, and that's ok. It doesn't suddenly make them maga and Trump lovers.

This is typical looney left reasoning. If you defend someone who disagrees with us, against us, it must mean you support them. It's what's driving people who were traditionally liberal, to become more conservative. Nobody can stand the nutjobs anymore. For someone who says they know little about US politics - why do you have such a strong opinion on Trump? It reeks of being told how to feel by the left-aligned media...
 
Craig_ said:
In my experience it's usually the poorly educated people, those with little to no accomplishments of their own, that tends to be racist.

If the ANC wasn't so dumb they'd focus heavily on education. People of all colours would benefit from that.
Click to expand...
you're right, I can even see it right here on the forum - to be racist, you normally have to lack critical thinking, which a decent education teaches you
 
PowerfulMagicalEvil said:
If Universities actually properly taught opposing views on things like they're supposed to, the students wouldn't be getting dunked on by Charlie Kirk all day as if they've never had any pushback, and we wouldn't be where we are.

Change my mind.
Click to expand...
what are you studying? at which varsity?
 
PowerfulMagicalEvil said:
If Universities actually properly taught opposing views on things like they're supposed to, the students wouldn't be getting dunked on by Charlie Kirk all day as if they've never had any pushback, and we wouldn't be where we are.

Change my mind.
Click to expand...
There is the "Change my mind" and the "Prove me wrong" version of pretty much the same thing.

Steven Crowders' "Change my mind" took place in a non-snowflake riddled environment usually. It became a meme, but he always seemed to be sitting there with no-one actually trying to change his mind.

Charlie Kirk's "Prove me wrong" was very much in the sights of the National Security Establishment.... and that's regardless of whether you think they arranged this murder.

There has been a definite shift away from the prevailing foreign policy narrative amongst the youth of the USA, and it seems Kirk was only just starting to find his ideological feet. My own sense is he was about to become a megafone for the Scott Hortons of the world.

If so, that would have meant lights-out for the Neo-cons' hold over the woke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X