RIP Charlie Kirk

Cray said:
moderate conservatives and moderate liberals have far more in common with each other than the fringes lunatics on their side.
Click to expand...
I can probably sit easier at the Table with a Communist or a Crossdresser than a Nazi though,all things considered
 
Cray said:
100% agree.
Click to expand...
Phew! I dodged a bullet there. I had just started doing contingency planning to live up to your expectations.

I was just thinking if you were somehow ever to come for coffee at my place, I'd have to ask one of my oldest friends from student days to not come visit, hide some photos of certain friends, I'd have to take some of my artwork down, maybe accost a watchtower to steal his magazines, get my wife into a apron without her moering me (or sponsor her to spend some time at Monte Casino), buy some Steve music ...

Steve was too much. I finally decided to rather try a "plan B".

:whistling:
 
vigras rojara said:
No, of course not. I just find it weird that millions of women can be sexually assaulted on a daily basis, but conservatives are more concerned about some weirdo who wants to compete in the girls' netball team.

That doesn't mean I think he should be able to compete on girls' netball team, just that the priorities are off.
Click to expand...

I found a great tool here:

Fallacy Detector | LF

www.logicalfallacies.org www.logicalfallacies.org

I put your statement into it and got this:

Fallacy Detector​

I just find it weird that millions of women can be sexually assaulted on a daily basis, but conservatives are more concerned about some weirdo who wants to compete in the girls' netball team.
Click to expand...

Straw Man Fallacy: The argument misrepresents the concerns of conservatives by suggesting that their focus on trans women in sports undermines the seriousness of sexual assault issues, which may not accurately reflect their position.

False Dichotomy: The statement implies that one must either care about sexual assault or about fairness in women's sports, ignoring the possibility that people can care about both issues simultaneously.

Analyze another piece of text.
 
Bewlen said:
I never knew conservatives were this deathly afraid of other people's totties and vajayjays
Click to expand...
You think this is about totties and vaggies. Were you one of the defenders of these people using women's change rooms, competing in women's sports, and brainwashing kids to "come out" and go butcher their bodies? Shame leave them be, they're just 1%. Were you one of the defenders of DEI ideology being overrepresented in media? Actually nevermind, already know the answer.
Bewlen said:
Attacks on Pelosi, Hortman and Shapiro were not "fun activities". They were attacks with the intent and aim to kill, by right extremists, on democrats. You like to try and make political violence and extremism an exclusively democrat phenomenon, but the evidence simply does not support you.

Evidence. Not feels.
Click to expand...
As it was pointed out in this very thread, was happened to Hortman was tragic. Who's fault is it that she didn't get as much coverage?

There's no excuse for the other two attacks either. You can give the whataboutisms a rest and stick to the topic. Schitty behaviour is schitty behaviour irrespective of who's doing it...
 
Mariner said:
I found a great tool here:

Fallacy Detector | LF

www.logicalfallacies.org www.logicalfallacies.org

I put your statement into it and got this:

Fallacy Detector​

I just find it weird that millions of women can be sexually assaulted on a daily basis, but conservatives are more concerned about some weirdo who wants to compete in the girls' netball team.

Straw Man Fallacy: The argument misrepresents the concerns of conservatives by suggesting that their focus on trans women in sports undermines the seriousness of sexual assault issues, which may not accurately reflect their position.

False Dichotomy: The statement implies that one must either care about sexual assault or about fairness in women's sports, ignoring the possibility that people can care about both issues simultaneously.

Analyze another piece of text.
Click to expand...

That's great, but I'm not going to rely on logicalfallacies.org to inform me about what my opinions and viewpoints should be.
 
TheMightyQuin said:
I think the world desperately needs some kind of new classification of what it means to be a Conservative and what it means to be a Liberal.

I mean I'm conservative, but I love to see a nipple on TV or wherever I can and I am also not a bible basher that burns down abortion clinics.

I'm also sure the very few Liberals on MyBB have blue dyed hair and septum rings, or are busy transitioning.

Just sayin'.....
Click to expand...
There was a whole conference on this, at least for conservatives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_for_Responsible_Citizenship
 
Mariner said:
Would that make critics and those demanding the release of the Epstein files secret pedos?
Click to expand...
Probably not, but you have to agree, that's it's pretty weird form someone to call gay sex an abomination in public when you secretly engage in it yourself. And that is by no means the only example.
 
Mike Hoxbig said:
You think this is about totties and vaggies. Were you one of the defenders of these people using women's change rooms, competing in women's sports, and brainwashing kids to "come out" and go butcher their bodies? Shame leave them be, they're just 1%.
Click to expand...
You are vastly overestimating the numbers in an attempt to justify what is essentially an argument of.... totties and vaggies. I know you said it "wasn't", but now you confirm that it "is", but its "really bad". Really bad, badder than it was ever before, maybe even the baddest in the universe. :ROFL:

Mike Hoxbig said:
Were you one of the defenders of DEI ideology being overrepresented in media? Actually nevermind, already know the answer.
Click to expand...
No I was not, for the same reason I think the conservative side of exaggerating and falsely amplifying lies supporting their side of the equation is just plain wrong. You're welcome to prove your allegation of which you "know the answer", I await such proof with bated breath.

No, you read that wrong. I said "bated", not "masturbated". Calm down.

Mike Hoxbig said:
As it was pointed out in this very thread, was happened to Hortman was tragic. Who's fault is it that she didn't get as much coverage?

There's no excuse for the other two attacks either. You can give the whataboutisms a rest and stick to the topic. Schitty behaviour is schitty behaviour irrespective of who's doing it...
Click to expand...
Let's first examine your first statement:
Now a guy is dead for speaking, and people are celebrating it and calling for the death of more people. Yes I see what they mean - perfectly reasonable behaviour, not looney at all. I must rather find better vocabulary apparently, instead of them calling out kak...
Click to expand...
So let me get this straight: you say the left is looney for their actions, and its exclusively a looney left feature. When presented with evidence that the exact same criminal (attempted murder) and socially questionable behaviour (celebrating such acts) is exhibited from the right - immediate and absolute proof that your claim is unequivocally false, you say I need to "give the whataboutisms a rest" ?

Bruh.
 
Cray said:
Probably not, but you have to agree, that's it's pretty weird form someone to call gay sex an abomination in public when you secretly engage in it yourself. And that is by no means the only example.
Click to expand...

You get self loathing homophobes. That dude milo yiannopoulos is a perfect example.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X