SA Politics Thread Part 11: The GNU Normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope its back again..

Deleted it cos the comments didn't go the way they wanted, so a second try is clearly needed


It feels like the only service so many of these political parties can offer us is race baiting.

r2wl5koxrvce1.jpeg
 
Why? Dricus is a proud South African. You can like who you want to, but why go to the lengths of changing your profile picture and directly showing your dislike. What are your reasons here?
I honestly don't feel like explaining again, just make peace with the fact that I hate the right wing lowlife and I take great pride in explicitly showing my feelings about it.
 
Dricus will be American soon, under trump refugee visa. Will you still bat for him then ? He won't be South African if he gets American citizenship, remember.

He will still be South African. You can be a dual citizen as a South African.
 
Good news but nothing is gonna happen to this scumbag.
But they already ruled that the song isn't hate speech?

This ruling probably would have went the other way if Trompie wasn't throwing his tantrums, which is why they ruled that way in the first place.

But what this means is that there's a whole bunch of confusion about whether the song is legal or not.

The judiciary have fcked themselves, and made it clear that just like the politicians, they don't know their earholes to arseholes ..
 
But they already ruled that the song isn't hate speech?

This ruling probably would have went the other way if Trompie wasn't throwing his tantrums, which is why they ruled that way in the first place.

But what this means is that there's a whole bunch of confusion about whether the song is legal or not.

The judiciary have fcked themselves, and made it clear that just like the politicians, they don't know their earholes to arseholes ..
You have the wrong end of the stick though because this ruling has nothing to do with a song, unless I am missing something?
 
But they already ruled that the song isn't hate speech?

This ruling probably would have went the other way if Trompie wasn't throwing his tantrums, which is why they ruled that way in the first place.

But what this means is that there's a whole bunch of confusion about whether the song is legal or not.

The judiciary have fcked themselves, and made it clear that just like the politicians, they don't know their earholes to arseholes ..
Constitutional court supersedes any ruling about song but what was brought in front of equality court was not just song. As far as I can see.
 
I suspect she will be joining Eusebius wherever it is people like that go after they die.
When candle burns fully, where does candle go ? Nowhere. Chemical reaction stops - that is what happens.

If you are thinking of hell or heaven, you must be religious delusional.
 
You have the wrong end of the stick though because this ruling has nothing to do with a song, unless I am missing something?

Constitutional court supersedes any ruling about song but what was brought in front of equality court was not just song. As far as I can see.
Yeah but what they say in the song is almost exactly what he said.

In fact worse, because it calls for the murder of a specific group of people, who are a minority.

So how can one be good, and the other bad? The message we are getting here is that it's ok to do hate speech, as long as you hide the message in a song, and then claim it's a metaphor...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X