SA Politics Thread Part 11: The GNU Normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Champy you are doing well tonight...

1. Technically are guilty of contempt of court
2. If the person is innocent , also guilty of invasion of privacy
3. Also guilty of prevention of medical care , a constitutional right

How many more laws are you going to break in 1 night ?
 
TheChamp said:
It's a story that her naming the accused can compromise the case, we have social media now and the names of accused people are leaked all the time, as long as it's not a member of the prosecution team doing that, nothing will impact the case.
Click to expand...
Not how the law is written.
 
Major Boredom said:
Champy you are doing well tonight...

1. Technically are guilty of contempt of court
2. If the person is innocent , also guilty of invasion of privacy
3. Also guilty of prevention of medical care , a constitutional right

How many more laws are you going to break in 1 night ?
Click to expand...
You are talking about the person who leaked the name of the accused, who asked you about that?

Do you randomly answer questions that were never asked or you only do it on Fridays?
 
Last edited:
TheChamp said:
Yet you don't know of any case where the accused walked free by using the reason of their identity being leaked by a random member of the public?
Click to expand...
You are saying that , not me . Deflecting anyway. I have given you enough reference to check law
 
TheChamp said:
Good, I am still applying my mind to your questions, rest assured that it is being treated withtge seriousness it deserves.
Click to expand...

patpat.webp
 
Major Boredom said:
Not sure why they need to be there anyway. it isnt a national dialog. It is an anc dialog
Click to expand...
Quick! Let's waste more time by pretending we're doing something.

It has to be asked wether or not they even dialogued about this dialogue to flesh out all its modalities.*

*SA politician speak.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X