Samsung losing to Apple


Why agree? If "smart" just comes down to a difference of opinion it pretty much nullifies his assertion that the iPhone isn't (or wasn't) a smartphone. By the dictionary definition that he provided it fulfilled the criteria. Unless by agreed you've realised that there's no possibility of winning this circular, joyless debate so you're giving in. In which case yeah... me too.
 
The other section was a little quiet today ... :/
 
Why agree? If "smart" just comes down to a difference of opinion it pretty much nullifies his assertion that the iPhone isn't (or wasn't) a smartphone. By the dictionary definition that he provided it fulfilled the criteria. Unless by agreed you've realised that there's no possibility of winning this circular, joyless debate so you're giving in. In which case yeah... me too.

Mostly the latter. And it seems people get very attached to certain features, and that is all they will acknowledge as being important.
The wikipedia article describes the whole discussion around what a smartphone is, and the iPhone is considered to have defined the modern smartphone. If someone doesn't want to acknowledge that because of reason X that they consider important, they are not going to change their mind :)

I see he didn't try defend his statement that the iPhone was low end. I suspect he was just in the mood for a debate :)
 
Last edited:
If someone doesn't want to acknowledge that because of reason X that they consider important, they are not going to change their mind :)

+1

Like connectivity, as an example
 
Only a fool would look at the iPhone introduction and say that it didn't change the mobile landscape. Dolby is that fool.
 
Only a fool would look at the iPhone introduction and say that it didn't change the mobile landscape. Dolby is that fool.

Would be fantastic if you you quantity :/

I gave valid reasons and the others' participating did as well - why do you feel it was a smartphone?
 
Would be fantastic if you you quantity :/

I gave valid reasons and the others' participating did as well - why do you feel it was a smartphone?

It wasn't a smartphone, it was a mobile computer that could make phone calls, just like every other "smartphone" that has followed it since.

Strange that you won't find a single person in the industry that would try and claim that the iPhone didn't change the entire market.
 
You obviously haven't read the last 2 pages

It certainly lacked any smartphone features or connections when launched. Yes - they made up at later stages, but to have a smartphone lacking key smartphone features is - um - well - not really a smartphone? We all know there phones on the market able to do more than an iPhone.

What we also said was that it came down to definition though - if you feel great calling a phone with no decent connection and dumbed down abilities, great. I don't.

That said I still think it's a great basic device
 
You obviously haven't read the last 2 pages

It certainly lacked any smartphone features or connections when launched. Yes - they made up at later stages, but to have a smartphone lacking key smartphone features is - um - well - not really a smartphone? We all know there phones on the market able to do more than an iPhone.

What we also said was that it came down to definition though - if you feel great calling a phone with no decent connection and dumbed down abilities, great. I don't.

That said I still think it's a great basic device

As we discussed already, it didn't "certainly lack smartphone" features. It lacked some features you find important. 3G doesn't make a smartphone, nor does copy and paste.

How is it a basic device? It outperforms almost everything out there
 
We did discuss it earlier - and we settled on it.

icyrus came along without reading anything, so thought I'd bring him up to speed with what you and I said
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X