Sanral: getting exact e-tag figures is hard

[rpm]

Sanral: getting exact e-tag figures is hard

Sanral says it never intended to mislead the public with its advertising - explaining that it is difficult to audit the exact figures.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Sanral: getting exact e-tag figures is hard

Sanral says it never intended to mislead the public with its advertising - explaining that it is difficult to audit the exact figures.

Why is it difficult?

should be something as simple as

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ETAGUsers....

 

[Messugga]

Why is it difficult?

should be something as simple as

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ETAGUsers....

Don't come with these Western tendencies. Way more difficult to fudge the numbers if you do it that way.

 

[Billy]

How hard is it to give the number of discreet ETags that have been activated by a gantry?

 

[Kosmik]

Why is it difficult?

should be something as simple as

SELECT COUNT(ETAGTransactionID) FROM ETAGTransactions....

FTFY

Sorry, exact same thought crossed my mind when reading the title.

 

[grok]

It's that bloody Verwoerd that made counting so difficult!!

 

[xumwun]

It's that bloody Verwoerd that made counting so difficult!!

Even computers find it hard apparently.

 

[lotus123]

Why is it difficult?

should be something as simple as

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ETAGUsers....LIMIT =1

fixed it.

 

[Sinbad]

select count(distinct(etagid)) from transaction;

Also, cry me a river, scamral. If it's so ****ing impossible to get numbers, DON'T PUBLICISE NUMBERS. YOU LIE YOU LIE YOU LIE

 

[])ragon_\/oid]

DROP TABLE *

That should count it up nicely...