SAPO

[Bluefinllama]

I am unsure of where this thread should actually go, so I've decided this seems to be the most suitable place.

I recently sent a watch through SAPO (insured), but now I've come across the following:
http://www.postoffice.co.za/Insuranceact.pdf

According to that document, watches (under point 7, C) they are not liable for watches.

Now, my question is, why on earth would they have accepted my insurance money in the first place if this was the case and if I do have grounds in the event that the parcel gets lost/stolen to claim since they accepted my money for the insurance (keep in mind that it was declared as being a watch as well as insured as such thereafter).:wtf:

 

[Swa]

Under the CPA you would but the claim process there isn't exactly as straight forward as it should be.

 

[ichigo]

I am unsure of where this thread should actually go, so I've decided this seems to be the most suitable place.

I recently sent a watch through SAPO (insured), but now I've come across the following:
http://www.postoffice.co.za/Insuranceact.pdf

According to that document, watches (under point 7, C) they are not liable for watches.

Now, my question is, why on earth would they have accepted my insurance money in the first place if this was the case and if I do have grounds in the event that the parcel gets lost/stolen to claim since they accepted my money for the insurance (keep in mind that it was declared as being a watch as well as insured as such thereafter).:wtf:

Same thing happened when an old cellphone got stolen out of an insured and tracked parcel we posted and claimed they arent liable for it yet they asked us to pay insurance.