South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
well no but remember that its was her doughnuttiness that made a policy direction requiring ICASA to urgently declare sat3 and related facilities as being essential (around 19 september last year iirc)Care to bet on Ivy and the DoC delaying this?![]()
@ gru - as hard as it may be to believe as you lie in your bed....we will see a massive drop nin international from around mid-2009....maybe stay in bed 'til then
This is where I see the good intention being twisted. Telkom can easily provide sub-standard access to the competition and merely claim "It's the same access we give ourselves" without ever having to prove that claim. How many years is ICASA still waiting for Telkom to provide details of it's ADSL costs / CAMS / whatever?The regulations also call for the company in control of the essential facility to apply the same conditions and provide access to the same conditions and of the same quality as it provides itself or its subsidiaries.
It is further made clear that the person in charge of access to an essential facility may not withdraw or impair the nature of the access once such access has been granted.
Any company which does not comply with the regulations can be fined up to
10 % of its annual turnover over the period within which the contravention continues.
ICASA has to act on reports of non-compliance for this to be meaningful.
Where does the income from the fine go?