Schabir Shaik arrested

so we only hear the judgement tomorrow?
i fail to see how somebody can assault somebody else while on parole and not have parole revoked - regardless of whether the offended party presses charges or not.
 
She did not say WHAT she had to shut up about. I am sure Dixie phrased it ambiguously on purpose. If she wanted to give details, she probably would have done so :)



That does not sound right to me ... all a bit confusing.

How can an alleged assault have nothing to do with parole conditions? The commission of any crime is an automatic violation of parole.

However, the flipside of the coin is that the assault has not been proved in a court. It is mere allegations.

If the DCS is not interested in the assault, how can they refer to him as a violent person ?

I think that they are preparing for a procedural error so he can walk.
 
so we only hear the judgement tomorrow?
i fail to see how somebody can assault somebody else while on parole and not have parole revoked - regardless of whether the offended party presses charges or not.

The 2 x cases of assault were not proven; mere allegations.

PLEASE NOTE this does not change my opinion of Shaik or the situation, but the law is the law :)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X