Nom Chompsky
High Tory
Interesting for anyone who wants to know about the Barnett Formula. I understand and accept the argument that areas which are remote (and there seem to be quite a few remote places in Scotland) will require additional funding for infrastructure upgrades and the like, but subsidising Scottish university fees? No thanks. It is a complete disgrace that Scottish and other students from EU member states get free tuition in Scotland but English students have to pay up to 9000 pounds per year.
Scottish Referendum: "My Barnett Formula needs to be tackled now - but no politician will"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...to-be-tackled-now-but-no-politician-will.html
Scottish Referendum: "My Barnett Formula needs to be tackled now - but no politician will"
Lord Barnett settles back into his armchair and rolls his eyes when I repeat Darling’s remark. “I was the first to give evidence to a House of Lords Select Committee in 2008 on the Barnett Formula,” he says. “It did a great deal of research and reported that Scotland gets £1600 more per head than England in public expenditure. That means they have been able to do things that we can’t like [cap] prescription charges and university fees. That’s not fair on English taxpayers.”
Such a disproportionate allocation of resources may go down well with Scots, Lord Barnett argues, many of whom have cited the formula as one of the reasons for remaining within the Union, but as evident this week, it causes huge resentment with English voters – 85 per cent of the UK population – who are being short-changed.
He must regret having given birth to this whole mess in the first place. “As Chief Secretary, you see, I was having a terrible time doing what I didn’t go into politics to do – cutting public expenditure,” he replies almost apologetically. “And I was having meetings with every departmental minister about their budget. They all wanted more money - Tony Benn and Barbara Castle more than most. I decided that I could get rid of at least three cabinet ministers – the secretaries of state for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – if I could settle on a formula for their budgets. So I set up this method for allocating public expenditure that the cabinet then agreed to. I never called it a formula. That only came later when Margaret Thatcher and John Major carried on with it.” (As did Tony Blair and Gordon Brown).
What Lord Barnett had known, but didn’t in the heat of the moment have either the time or inclination to tackle (this being the era of an IMF bail out of Britain and the “Winter of Discontent”), was that what he calls the “starting point” for the formula – ie the estimate of Scotland’s population – was wrong.
“I knew it used out-of-date figures. So Scotland was being overpaid, Wales was about even and Northern Ireland was very complex because of what was going on there then. But I left it as it was. My first priority was to make a system to save me trouble. The real problem,” he admits, with a wise-old uncle chuckle, “is that now no politician wants to tackle it. And I say that as someone who’s been in politics for 50 years. The Barnett Formula saves people trouble. It saves prime ministers worrying. That’s the way with politics.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...to-be-tackled-now-but-no-politician-will.html
Last edited:
