South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
There's those jumping goats again....Load shedding started with Mbeki when gov didn't listen to Eskom warnings, but yeah blame the white guy for problems caused by blacks, we're used to be escape goats by now.
Wet roads cause rain.This article is disingenuous. De Ruyter inherited the mess that is Eskom and we can clearly see things changing. It is just a matter of time until we see improvement to the grid. At least under him the rubbish is being taken out.
If he has been taking units offline for maintenance, then its perfect. Do we then have any reports that show units under maintenance and the availability rates afterwards? Something concrete to show the work he is doing.The author of this article is ignorant and too lazy to have researched properly. A competent journalist would know that he's been taking units offline for maintenance.
The CSIR stopped functioning in 1994.Someone should check the credentials of these communist councils.
Yes. News24 constantly update on maintenance and the possibility of loads loadshedding because of that. Eskom themselves update their Twitter account to reflect the status.If he has been taking units offline for maintenance, then its perfect. Do we then have any reports that show units under maintenance and the availability rates afterwards? Something concrete to show the work he is doing.
If he has been taking units offline for maintenance, then its perfect. Do we then have any reports that show units under maintenance and the availability rates afterwards? Something concrete to show the work he is doing.
Secret load shedding? You mean load reduction which is announced through their twitter and facebook feeds every single day twice a day.I have been following discussions involving De Ruyter for a while now. It seems like everything that happens at Eskom under him right now is not his fault. What's his role then? He destroyed Nampak https://citizen.co.za/news/2206538/...r-destroy-nampak-or-save-it-from-going-under/ , and currently, under him, there is secret load-shedding of 5 hours up to 3 times a week in villages across the country. These happen at peak hours and they are not reported, all so that it can be claimed that loadshedding is lower than it really is.
In short, I blame him. What is he being paid for?

Good question, is he being paid to disconnect illegal connections or to turn a blind eye?I have been following discussions involving De Ruyter for a while now. It seems like everything that happens at Eskom under him right now is not his fault. What's his role then? He destroyed Nampak https://citizen.co.za/news/2206538/...r-destroy-nampak-or-save-it-from-going-under/ , and currently, under him, there is secret load-shedding of 5 hours up to 3 times a week in villages across the country. These happen at peak hours and they are not reported, all so that it can be claimed that loadshedding is lower than it really is.
In short, I blame him. What is he being paid for?
I don't want to go into their semantic games. Anyway, the point is that loadshedding is very bad under him, and he is on record promising the opposite. Clearly, he didn't know what he was talking about. At least.Secret load shedding? You mean load reduction which is announced through their twitter and facebook feeds every single day twice a day.
View attachment 1124324
Load shedding has been bad for a long time, he's actually been trying to do maintenance.I don't want to go into their semantic games. Anyway, the point is that loadshedding is very bad under him, and he is on record promising the opposite. Clearly, he didn't know what he was talking about. At least.
You need maintenance to fix the problems. With maintenance comes OBVIOUS loadshedding. This will be the case for years to come. This is NOT on De Ruyter.I don't want to go into their semantic games. Anyway, the point is that loadshedding is very bad under him, and he is on record promising the opposite. Clearly, he didn't know what he was talking about. At least.
Loadshedding and load reduction are 2 different things.I don't want to go into their semantic games. Anyway, the point is that loadshedding is very bad under him, and he is on record promising the opposite. Clearly, he didn't know what he was talking about. At least.
You can't explain this it seems, I've tried a few times.Loadshedding and load reduction are 2 different things.
Load reduction is targeting municipalities and areas that don't pay Eskom for electricity supplied.
If electricity is not being paid for then no electricity should be supplied.
“Andre De Ruyter was an underwhelming choice to lead the then R29 billion Nampak in 2014. Today, Nampak’s market value is R5 billion,” he tweeted.
A pity.You can't explain this it seems, I've tried a few times.