'South Korea will remove evolution from its high school textbooks'

[Fudzy]

There is still a debate on what exactly it is so my view is not set in stone and I am still reading about current opinions. Though I favour it as some sort of intrinsic propensity.

So you believe in evolution then?

 

[boramk]

What splendid news !

Anyway you don't actually need religion to achieve this, amoeba-to-man evolution has been shown to be pseudo-science, at best, in and of itself and as such certainly does not belong in school text books.

Apt username.

 

[Nicodeamus]

What splendid news !

Anyway you don't actually need religion to achieve this, amoeba-to-man evolution has been shown to be pseudo-science, at best, in and of itself and as such certainly does not belong in school text books.

there is more evidence supporting it than the hypothesis (actually 'guess' ) of Jesus Christ..

 

[Techne]

So you believe in evolution then?

Evolution is just another term for change. Change happens, get used to it, get over it. Do you believe in evolution?

 

[Techne]

there is more evidence supporting it than the hypothesis (actually 'guess' ) of Jesus Christ..

Lol, are you a myther?

 

[abandonallhope]

Apt username.

Just shows how warped your sense of logic has become

 

[abandonallhope]

there is more evidence supporting it than the hypothesis (actually 'guess' ) of Jesus Christ..

We're not talking about Christianity and God.

We're talking about soup-to-man evolution, and how full of holes it is.

 

[boramk]

Just shows how warped your sense of logic has become

Sure, my logic is warped because you don't understand evolution.

 

[abandonallhope]

Sure, my logic is warped because you don't understand evolution.

absolutely, 100% correct.

 

[boramk]

absolutely, 100% correct.

At least we ended this on an agreement.

 

[buyeye]

LAW=FACT
THEORY=NOT FACT BUT BEST POSSIBLE EXPLANATION BY AVAILABLE SCIENTIFIX METHODS AND MINDS.

Caps for emphasis that we know what we are talking about.

 

[Apache]

My interpretation is fitness= those having the properties best suited to survive in their particular environment.

Fish have properties making their survival in water more likely than mine.

But many years ago, a fish decided to take a walk out of the water and after many years became a man.

 

[Archer]

What splendid news !

Anyway you don't actually need religion to achieve this, amoeba-to-man evolution has been shown to be pseudo-science, at best, in and of itself and as such certainly does not belong in school text books.

It has? Links please. I'm very interested to hear the conclusive evidence proving this. Genuinely interested, no jokes. I prefer learning whats really going on instead of living a life of ignorance.

Evolution science only goes back like 200 years atm, it's not suppose to be about the creation of man.

That is so blatantly incorrect its not even funny.

 

[boramk]

But many years ago, a fish decided to take a walk out of the water and after many years became a man.

Yeah, there was only one fish in the entire planet and that became man. Thank you for summarising evolution for us bro

 

[STS]

There is a difference between being physiologically fit and "fitness" in evolutionary terms, correct. We are talking about evolutionary fitness. Your example appears to do with physiological fitness (survival of the physiologically fit and fast) of animals being hunted. Not quite the "fitness" when people talk about evolutionary fitness. Don't confuse the two.

i disagree, perhaps i am wrong but due to mutations and the genes passed down some organisms are better and faster. you can have a group of gizelle being chased by a lion, and with eliminating luck and other factors like age and gender, you have two animals with slight differences competing to outrun a predator.

there are too many factors to list, but of course some animals will have an evolutionary edge like having darker fur making them better camoflauged, having a larger wing span making flying easier, and so forth.

 

[abandonallhope]

It has? Links please. I'm very interested to hear the conclusive evidence proving this. Genuinely interested, no jokes. I prefer learning whats really going on instead of living a life of ignorance.

We can start with the fact that the entire theory hangs on nothing.

 

[STS]

What splendid news !

Anyway you don't actually need religion to achieve this, amoeba-to-man evolution has been shown to be pseudo-science, at best, in and of itself and as such certainly does not belong in school text books.

don't need religion, but it's more convenient? believing man came from a single celled organism is too unrealistic but believing somewhere up in a sky is a man with toes and genitalia and a mouth full of teeth and a face full of hair watching over us and making things explode into existance is believable?

 

[boramk]

We can start with the fact that the entire theory hangs on nothing.

Definition for elaboration:

amplification: addition of extra material or illustration or clarifying detail;

 

[Apache]

i disagree, perhaps i am wrong but due to mutations and the genes passed down some organisms are better and faster. you can have a group of gizelle being chased by a lion, and with eliminating luck and other factors like age and gender, you have two animals with slight differences competing to outrun a predator.

there are too many factors to list, but of course some animals will have an evolutionary edge like having darker fur making them better camoflauged, having a larger wing span making flying easier, and so forth.

So why did lizards become birds? Just a link will suffice.

 

[Archer]

We can start with the fact that the entire theory hangs on nothing.

I must have missed the facts in this post of yours, where are they again? Links to people disproving the theory of evolution please?
Or are you one of those misinformed people who thinks the theory of evolution describes the beginning of life? For clarity, the theory of evolution has NOTHING to do with the origin of life...

PS - where do you think we came from?