Spur Incident

konfab said:
All discrimination in South Africa is by definition illegal unless stipulated for by government. This is constitutional law.

If you somehow got ahold of their arrest record (not their criminal record), and used that to discriminate against someone, that would be discriminating against someone for no valid reason.
Click to expand...

so you are telling me, if you worked in HR, and you got a CV in of someone who finished their degree in 2016, you would not go out of your way to check if they took part in the fees must fall protests?

and you are telling me that not picking that CV ahead of someone who also studied at the same uni, at the same time, but has no arrest record would be discrimination?
 
Baxteen said:
so you are telling me, if you worked in HR, and you got a CV in of someone who finished their degree in 2016, you would not go out of your way to check if they took part in the fees must fall protests?

and you are telling me that not picking that CV ahead of someone who also studied at the same uni, at the same time, but has no arrest record would be discrimination?
Click to expand...


I would check, then I would ask them in an interview about it to see what their role in it was and see if they had learned from it as a person. If they went around and looted from the university, and couldn't logically justify it, that would be very fair grounds to not employ them.
 
konfab said:
All discrimination in South Africa is by definition illegal unless stipulated for by government. This is constitutional law.

If you somehow got hold of their arrest record (not their criminal record), and used that to discriminate against someone, that would be discriminating against someone for no valid reason.
Click to expand...
Please provide that line in the constitution cause we all as humans discriminate time from time. And no I am not talking about racisim. If you were selling something and you had two buyers....and one of the buyers turns out to be a friend.

Then you are going to choose that friend.....discriminating.
 
konfab said:
I would check, then I would ask them in an interview about it to see what their role in it was and see if they had learned from it as a person. If they went around and looted from the university, and couldn't logically justify it, that would be very fair grounds to not employ them.
Click to expand...
But that would be discriminating as they were never charged or convicted.
 
crackersa said:
Please provide that line in the constitution cause we all as humans discriminate time from time. And no I am not talking about racisim. If you were selling something and you had two buyers....and one of the buyers turns out to be a friend.

Then you are going to choose that friend.....discriminating.
Click to expand...

That is not discrimination and it is more than a reach. That is called preferential treatment and isn't against any laws.
 
Baxteen accused of being a SJW. Lol what a joke. That label gets thrown around by people who use it as a crutch in an argument.

The guy was violent and aggressive, there's no defending that.
 
Not seeing anything tha resembles defense of his actions. I do see a number of posts show that both parties were responsible for the end result, but nothing absolvingthe man of any guilt. Saying the woman is ALSO responsible is NOT saying the man is NOT responsible.
 
Last edited:
thechamp said:
.

A lowlife and bully, just as many people thought when he was throwing tantrums at Spur, you can never be wrong about his type.
Click to expand...

Now wouldn't we love to see you say that about your ANC murderers, criminals etc... and nothing about the rude bitch. If she said that to me she would have been in hospital or worse.
 
Cloudster said:
*sigh* your stupidity, ignorance, lack of education and racism is on full display for everyone to see here.

Here is a man with a record of violence and cases of abuse against woman.

There's a video of this man, getting physical with a child who is not his and a woman by lifting a table and threatening her physically, trying to intimidate her physically.

You, genius that you are, deduce from the facts at hand that he was banned because his daughter was bullied? Where is the evidence of this? Oh right, you have none and choose to fabricate a story you can not verify or can't even say you have some kind of evidence for. Oh, so then Spur decided to side with "the black community" because this is how it works in your tiny brain right? Black vs White, that's all it boils down to. Nevermind the substance of the argument or debate, it all comes down to "black vs white".

Can you be more ignorant, racist and stupid?
Click to expand...

You are in a cloud aren't you. Can't see through it. She was rude in the first place. Just deserved what she got, pity he didn't gave her a real PK. He didn't get physical, he took the child to his mother. That assault, stop being a freakin pissy. *****ing crybabies. Grow some balls.
 
Oppiekoffie said:
You are in a cloud aren't you. Can't see through it. She was rude in the first place. Just deserved what she got, pity he didn't gave her a real PK. He didn't get physical, he took the child to his mother. That assault, stop being a freakin pissy. *****ing crybabies. Grow some balls.
Click to expand...

I'm suspecting you're on some really strong meds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X