This right here folks is the classic definition of what a white liberal is NOT!
Odd I recall you white liberals *spit* telling us black criminals who use racially derogatory words while committing crimes weren't racist.....
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
This right here folks is the classic definition of what a white liberal is NOT!
Howdy partner! How's the corn:?Odd I recall you white liberals *spit* telling us black criminals who use racially derogatory words while committing crimes weren't racist.....
In any conversation about apartheid, white liberals will immediately and loudly bring up the fact that their parents were forced to join the army. As if this fact mitigates generations of economic and political advantage. As if life is a neat game of tag where you can shout "Nix!" and invoke some sort of blanket amnesty, instead of the messy web of power it really is.
My grandfather volunteered to fight in World War II and my one uncle volunteered repeatedly to fight at the border. Does that count? Can I have my badge now?In any conversation about apartheid, white liberals will immediately and loudly bring up the fact that their parents were forced to join the army. As if this fact mitigates generations of economic and political advantage. As if life is a neat game of tag where you can shout "Nix!" and invoke some sort of blanket amnesty, instead of the messy web of power it really is.
How many times do we have to tell you guys we don't have spittoons round here no more? And the toilets are in the houses now, so please stop going in the back yard.Odd I recall you white liberals *spit*
They're not? Who said that? Has the head of the white liberal conspiracy been shooting his mouth off again?black criminals who use racially derogatory words while committing crimes weren't racist
I laughed.... not at the article but at the writer.
I am a white liberal and none of his "points" apply to me.
15 things white conservatives say and do:
1] Lets go f[censored]k that k[censored]r up
2] Lets have a brandy and coke and then go [censored] that [censored] up
3] Lets watch the rugby then go [censored] that [censored] up
4] Im better because I have a white skin and live in a trailor
5] Lets go to church then [censored] that [censored] up for God
6] None of the problems today were caused by my beautiful Apartheid
7] It was soooo much better during Apartheid, we could [censored] the [censored]s up without getting into trouble
Lists ends early as conservatives run out of imagination about here.
Disclaimer this post is satire and a reflection of how stupid the OP is![]()
If Conservatives were 'dumb' America would be a backwater country and not the leading economy and powerhouse of the world.
The article was actually a satire of DA (ex PFP, DP, SA labour party etc) supporters who blamed apartheid on Afrikaaners (NP) while themselves supporting it 100%. It was a pretty poor attempt at that but it's quite truthful. When you look at many 'white' liberals nowadays they were full blown supporters of previous policies - just had an issue because the guys in power were not of English stock.
The thing is, that the ANC (and black people in general) have seen though the condescending patronising stance of many of these guys.
Lol, no offense, but I dont take anything you say seriously. Your reputation precedes you. Strange, my parents were English, and went door to door in the Yes/No Ja/Nee vote voting against the Nats. English South Africans for the most part hated the Afrikaans administration and how it treated English people like second class white people people.
I have not met any liberals who supported Apartheid. Liberals are not the white people who stand at the braais going "those fking kfirs this" "those dking kfirs that" constantly. We are normally the ones who turn our heads away from you in shame and walk away.
Lol, no offense, but I dont take anything you say seriously. Your reputation precedes you. Strange, my parents were English, and went door to door in the Yes/No Ja/Nee vote voting against the Nats. English South Africans for the most part hated the Afrikaans administration and how it treated English people like second class white people people.
I have not met any liberals who supported Apartheid. Liberals are not the white people who stand at the braais going "those fking kfirs this" "those dking kfirs that" constantly. We are normally the ones who turn our heads away from you in shame and walk away.
BS, the NATS supported the YES vote.
Sorry, the NATS biggest support areas [as in provinces] voted no.Of course some Nats voted yes [mostly the smarter ones in leadership pushed for change]... but just a few. It came down to coastal areas vs inland areas, with the Yes vote just winning.
The National Party "Yes" vote campaign was of a kind that had never before been seen in South Africa. The National Party held large political gatherings through the country and published advertisements in many national newspapers and bought commercial time in television. It produced massive election "Yes" posters with the message "Yes! Ja! SA" and a poster showing a picture of an AWB member with a gun and with the text "You can stop this man! Vote YES".
A whole lot of whiteys broke off from the NATS to go to the conservatives.The National Party and Democratic Party campaigned for a "Yes" vote, while the conservative right wing led by the Conservative Party campaigned for a "No" vote. Much of de Klerk's efforts in 1992 were directed toward appeasing and weakening his right-wing opponents, the conservative defenders of apartheid who had broken away from the National Party during the 1980s. De Klerk attempted to show white South Africans that the government was not giving up power to the ANC, but negotiating on the basis of "power sharing". It warned the white voters that a "No" vote would mean continuation of international sanctions, the danger of civil war and worsening chaos in South Africa.
The National Party "Yes" vote campaign was of a kind that had never before been seen in South Africa. The National Party held large political gatherings through the country and published advertisements in many national newspapers and bought commercial time in television. It produced massive election "Yes" posters with the message "Yes! Ja! SA" and a poster showing a picture of an AWB member with a gun and with the text "You can stop this man! Vote YES".
The Democratic Party had more traditional posters with the message "Ja vir vrede (Yes for peace)".
The "No" campaign, led by Dr Andries Treurnicht, played on racial prejudices and warned of "black majority rule" and "ANC communist rule". The Conservative Party also advocated white self-determination and argued that white South Africans had the right to rule themselves. During the campaign, the "No" side also started to advocate an independent homeland, or volkstaat, for the white minority.
BBSA, aah I see where I am confused.
It was the conservatives that tried to fk everything up:
A whole lot of whiteys broke off from the NATS to go to the conservatives.
The results does not reflect that, almost 70% of the whites voted YES. Even in Pretoria the majority voted YES.
The results does not reflect that, almost 70% of the whites voted YES. Even in Pretoria the majority voted YES.