I'm not so sure. IMO the FA cannot back down but might halve the "sentence".
The club should go all the way with this. LFC usually do when they've suffered an injustice
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I'm not so sure. IMO the FA cannot back down but might halve the "sentence".
Why is JT being prosecuted and Suarez's case only getting dealt with by the football association?
Terry had a public complaint Suarez did not. Although Suarez should face charges too now since he's been found "guilty" of it by the FA.
You mean a member of the public complained about JT? Not sure I understand that bit.
The Metropolitan Police has begun a formal investigation into allegations that Chelsea captain John Terry racially abused QPR's Anton Ferdinand.
Terry, 30, has categorically denied aiming a racist slur at defender Ferdinand during Chelsea's 1-0 loss at Loftus Road on 23 October.
The Police spent a week "assessing" a complaint from a member of the public before announcing an investigation.
The Football Association (FA) is also looking into the incident.
Some viewers claimed video replays from the match at Loftus Road showed Terry using racist language, while the FA said it had received a complaint.
Seems like it
Oh thanks. I notice though that even though Ferdinand never complained he seems to be suggesting JT did say something unsavory.
Chief London prosecutor Alison Saunders told police there was a realistic possibility of conviction surrounding claims Terry called Ferdinand a "black c***" during a league match.
Is Black c*** really hate speech? Not saying JT is wrong, not saying he's right either (Will judge at the end) but is black c*** really a racial slur?
What's the difference between calling him C*** and black c***?
Is Black c*** really hate speech? Not saying JT is wrong, not saying he's right either (Will judge at the end) but is black c*** really a racial slur? What's the difference between calling him C*** and black c***?
Why is the race card always played when a "Black" person is perceived to be a victim ?
Are "blacks" not guilty of the same stereotypical barrage of insults against other race groups ?
The high profile abuse appears to almost always involve Jews or black people. The white people at least here say it is not possible to racially offend a white person.Why is the race card always played when a "Black" person is perceived to be a victim ?
Are "blacks" not guilty of the same stereotypical barrage of insults against other race groups ?
Black is racial
See my edit. It is what the sayer intended not the color word by itself.and? So any insult word that follows a race word is automatically a racial slur? :wtf:
You white dumbass!
You black idiot!
So those are racial slurs now? :wtf: